PBL State Estimation with Surface Observations, a Column Model, and an Ensemble FilterSource: Monthly Weather Review:;2007:;volume( 135 ):;issue: 008::page 2958DOI: 10.1175/MWR3443.1Publisher: American Meteorological Society
Abstract: Following recent results showing the potential for using surface observations of temperature, water vapor mixing ratio, and winds to determine PBL profiles, this paper reports on experiments with real observations. A 1D column model with soil, surface-layer, and PBL parameterization schemes that are the same as in the Weather Research and Forecasting model is used to estimate PBL profiles with an ensemble filter. Surface observations over the southern Great Plains are assimilated during the spring and early summer period of 2003. To strictly quantify the utility of the observations for determining PBL profiles in the ensemble filter framework, only climatological information is provided for initialization and forcing. The analysis skill, measured against rawinsondes for an independent verification, is compared against climatology to quantify the influence of the observations. Sensitivity to changing parameterization schemes, and to prescribed values of observation error variance, is examined. Temporal propagation of skillful analyses is also assessed, separating the effects of good prior state estimates from the impact of assimilation at night when covariance is weak. Results show that accurate profiles of temperature, mixing ratio, and winds are estimated with the column model and ensemble filter assimilating only surface observations. Results are largely insensitive to choice of parameterization scheme and specified observation error variance. The effects of using different parameterization schemes within the column model depend on whether assimilation is included, showing the importance of evaluating models within assimilation systems. At night, skillful estimates are possible because the influence of the observations from the previous day is temporally propagated, and atmospheric dynamics in the residual layer operate on slow time scales. It is expected that these profiles will have applications for nowcasting and secondary models (e.g., plume dispersion models) that rely on accurate specification of PBL structure.
|
Collections
Show full item record
contributor author | Hacker, Joshua P. | |
contributor author | Rostkier-Edelstein, Dorita | |
date accessioned | 2017-06-09T17:28:40Z | |
date available | 2017-06-09T17:28:40Z | |
date copyright | 2007/08/01 | |
date issued | 2007 | |
identifier issn | 0027-0644 | |
identifier other | ams-85989.pdf | |
identifier uri | http://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4229496 | |
description abstract | Following recent results showing the potential for using surface observations of temperature, water vapor mixing ratio, and winds to determine PBL profiles, this paper reports on experiments with real observations. A 1D column model with soil, surface-layer, and PBL parameterization schemes that are the same as in the Weather Research and Forecasting model is used to estimate PBL profiles with an ensemble filter. Surface observations over the southern Great Plains are assimilated during the spring and early summer period of 2003. To strictly quantify the utility of the observations for determining PBL profiles in the ensemble filter framework, only climatological information is provided for initialization and forcing. The analysis skill, measured against rawinsondes for an independent verification, is compared against climatology to quantify the influence of the observations. Sensitivity to changing parameterization schemes, and to prescribed values of observation error variance, is examined. Temporal propagation of skillful analyses is also assessed, separating the effects of good prior state estimates from the impact of assimilation at night when covariance is weak. Results show that accurate profiles of temperature, mixing ratio, and winds are estimated with the column model and ensemble filter assimilating only surface observations. Results are largely insensitive to choice of parameterization scheme and specified observation error variance. The effects of using different parameterization schemes within the column model depend on whether assimilation is included, showing the importance of evaluating models within assimilation systems. At night, skillful estimates are possible because the influence of the observations from the previous day is temporally propagated, and atmospheric dynamics in the residual layer operate on slow time scales. It is expected that these profiles will have applications for nowcasting and secondary models (e.g., plume dispersion models) that rely on accurate specification of PBL structure. | |
publisher | American Meteorological Society | |
title | PBL State Estimation with Surface Observations, a Column Model, and an Ensemble Filter | |
type | Journal Paper | |
journal volume | 135 | |
journal issue | 8 | |
journal title | Monthly Weather Review | |
identifier doi | 10.1175/MWR3443.1 | |
journal fristpage | 2958 | |
journal lastpage | 2972 | |
tree | Monthly Weather Review:;2007:;volume( 135 ):;issue: 008 | |
contenttype | Fulltext |