YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Monthly Weather Review
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Monthly Weather Review
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    The Characteristics of Key Analysis Errors. Part III: A Diagnosis of Their Evolution

    Source: Monthly Weather Review:;2007:;volume( 135 ):;issue: 007::page 2754
    Author:
    Caron, Jean-François
    ,
    Yau, M. K.
    ,
    Laroche, Stéphane
    DOI: 10.1175/MWR3431.1
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: This paper presents a diagnostic study of the evolution of initial corrections obtained from the key analysis error algorithm that minimizes the short-range (24 h) forecast errors for four specific events poorly forecasted over the eastern part of North America. A potential vorticity (PV) perspective is employed. It is shown that the modification to the low-level structure at the initial time is mainly attributed to the modification of the low-level PV distribution, while changes in the upper-level structure are attributed to the modification of the upper-level PV distribution. The low-level corrections grow mainly through background surface potential temperature advection by the wind corrections attributable to the interior PV corrections. Changes in the diabatic processes and the vertical alignment of low-level PV corrections by differential PV advection also increase the magnitude of the low-level corrections with time. The upper-level corrections grow by advection of background PV from wind corrections. However, the cause of these latter wind corrections responsible for upper-level background PV advection varies from case to case. An investigation of the relative importance of the low-level and of the upper-level initial corrections to produce the final-time corrections also reveals strong variability between cases. Finally, comparison of two cases in which the key analysis errors propagate vertically with two others without significant vertical propagation shows how the relative position of the key analysis errors with respect to the structure of the background flow can influence the evolution of the initial corrections.
    • Download: (7.473Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      The Characteristics of Key Analysis Errors. Part III: A Diagnosis of Their Evolution

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4229483
    Collections
    • Monthly Weather Review

    Show full item record

    contributor authorCaron, Jean-François
    contributor authorYau, M. K.
    contributor authorLaroche, Stéphane
    date accessioned2017-06-09T17:28:38Z
    date available2017-06-09T17:28:38Z
    date copyright2007/07/01
    date issued2007
    identifier issn0027-0644
    identifier otherams-85977.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4229483
    description abstractThis paper presents a diagnostic study of the evolution of initial corrections obtained from the key analysis error algorithm that minimizes the short-range (24 h) forecast errors for four specific events poorly forecasted over the eastern part of North America. A potential vorticity (PV) perspective is employed. It is shown that the modification to the low-level structure at the initial time is mainly attributed to the modification of the low-level PV distribution, while changes in the upper-level structure are attributed to the modification of the upper-level PV distribution. The low-level corrections grow mainly through background surface potential temperature advection by the wind corrections attributable to the interior PV corrections. Changes in the diabatic processes and the vertical alignment of low-level PV corrections by differential PV advection also increase the magnitude of the low-level corrections with time. The upper-level corrections grow by advection of background PV from wind corrections. However, the cause of these latter wind corrections responsible for upper-level background PV advection varies from case to case. An investigation of the relative importance of the low-level and of the upper-level initial corrections to produce the final-time corrections also reveals strong variability between cases. Finally, comparison of two cases in which the key analysis errors propagate vertically with two others without significant vertical propagation shows how the relative position of the key analysis errors with respect to the structure of the background flow can influence the evolution of the initial corrections.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleThe Characteristics of Key Analysis Errors. Part III: A Diagnosis of Their Evolution
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume135
    journal issue7
    journal titleMonthly Weather Review
    identifier doi10.1175/MWR3431.1
    journal fristpage2754
    journal lastpage2777
    treeMonthly Weather Review:;2007:;volume( 135 ):;issue: 007
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian