A Nonlinear Statistical Model of Turbulent Air–Sea FluxesSource: Monthly Weather Review:;2007:;volume( 135 ):;issue: 003::page 1077DOI: 10.1175/MWR3335.1Publisher: American Meteorological Society
Abstract: Most of the bulk algorithms used to calculate turbulent air?sea fluxes of momentum and heat are iterative algorithms whose convergence is slow and not always achieved. To avoid these drawbacks that are critical when large datasets must be processed, a statistical model of bulk air?sea fluxes based on artificial neural networks was developed. It was found that classical bulk algorithms were slower than the statistical model, by a factor of 1.75?7 depending on the bulk algorithm selected for the comparison. A set of 12 global analyses of an operational meteorological model as well as in situ data corresponding to equatorial and midlatitude conditions were used to assess the accuracy of the proposed model. The wind stress, latent, and sensible heat fluxes calculated with neural networks have acceptable biases with respect to bulk fluxes, between 0.4% and 1% depending on the flux magnitudes. Moreover, the rms deviation between bulk fluxes and neural network flux estimates is only 0.003 N m?2 for the momentum flux, 0.5 W m?2 for the sensible heat flux, and 1.8 W m?2 for the latent heat flux, at global scale, which is small compared with the natural variability of these quantities or the expected error.
|
Collections
Show full item record
contributor author | Bourras, Denis | |
contributor author | Reverdin, Gilles | |
contributor author | Caniaux, Guy | |
contributor author | Belamari, Sophie | |
date accessioned | 2017-06-09T17:28:21Z | |
date available | 2017-06-09T17:28:21Z | |
date copyright | 2007/03/01 | |
date issued | 2007 | |
identifier issn | 0027-0644 | |
identifier other | ams-85881.pdf | |
identifier uri | http://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4229376 | |
description abstract | Most of the bulk algorithms used to calculate turbulent air?sea fluxes of momentum and heat are iterative algorithms whose convergence is slow and not always achieved. To avoid these drawbacks that are critical when large datasets must be processed, a statistical model of bulk air?sea fluxes based on artificial neural networks was developed. It was found that classical bulk algorithms were slower than the statistical model, by a factor of 1.75?7 depending on the bulk algorithm selected for the comparison. A set of 12 global analyses of an operational meteorological model as well as in situ data corresponding to equatorial and midlatitude conditions were used to assess the accuracy of the proposed model. The wind stress, latent, and sensible heat fluxes calculated with neural networks have acceptable biases with respect to bulk fluxes, between 0.4% and 1% depending on the flux magnitudes. Moreover, the rms deviation between bulk fluxes and neural network flux estimates is only 0.003 N m?2 for the momentum flux, 0.5 W m?2 for the sensible heat flux, and 1.8 W m?2 for the latent heat flux, at global scale, which is small compared with the natural variability of these quantities or the expected error. | |
publisher | American Meteorological Society | |
title | A Nonlinear Statistical Model of Turbulent Air–Sea Fluxes | |
type | Journal Paper | |
journal volume | 135 | |
journal issue | 3 | |
journal title | Monthly Weather Review | |
identifier doi | 10.1175/MWR3335.1 | |
journal fristpage | 1077 | |
journal lastpage | 1089 | |
tree | Monthly Weather Review:;2007:;volume( 135 ):;issue: 003 | |
contenttype | Fulltext |