YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Monthly Weather Review
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Monthly Weather Review
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Numerically Simulated Electrification and Lightning of the 29 June 2000 STEPS Supercell Storm

    Source: Monthly Weather Review:;2006:;volume( 134 ):;issue: 010::page 2734
    Author:
    Kuhlman, Kristin M.
    ,
    Ziegler, Conrad L.
    ,
    Mansell, Edward R.
    ,
    MacGorman, Donald R.
    ,
    Straka, Jerry M.
    DOI: 10.1175/MWR3217.1
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: A three-dimensional dynamic cloud model incorporating airflow dynamics, microphysics, and thunderstorm electrification mechanisms is used to simulate the first 3 h of the 29 June 2000 supercell from the Severe Thunderstorm Electrification and Precipitation Study (STEPS). The 29 June storm produced large flash rates, predominately positive cloud-to-ground lightning, large hail, and an F1 tornado. Four different simulations of the storm are made, each one using a different noninductive (NI) charging parameterization. The charge structure, and thus lightning polarity, of the simulated storm is sensitive to the treatment of cloud water dependence in the different NI charging schemes. The results from the simulations are compared with observations from STEPS, including balloon-borne electric field meter soundings and flash locations from the Lightning Mapping Array. For two of the parameterizations, the observed ?inverted? tripolar charge structure is well approximated by the model. The polarity of the ground flashes is opposite that of the lowest charge region of the inverted tripole in both the observed storm and the simulations. Total flash rate is well correlated with graupel volume, updraft volume, and updraft mass flux. However, there is little correlation between total flash rate and maximum updraft speed. Based on the correlations found in both the observed and simulated storm, the total flash rate appears to be most representative of overall storm intensity.
    • Download: (4.632Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Numerically Simulated Electrification and Lightning of the 29 June 2000 STEPS Supercell Storm

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4229247
    Collections
    • Monthly Weather Review

    Show full item record

    contributor authorKuhlman, Kristin M.
    contributor authorZiegler, Conrad L.
    contributor authorMansell, Edward R.
    contributor authorMacGorman, Donald R.
    contributor authorStraka, Jerry M.
    date accessioned2017-06-09T17:27:58Z
    date available2017-06-09T17:27:58Z
    date copyright2006/10/01
    date issued2006
    identifier issn0027-0644
    identifier otherams-85764.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4229247
    description abstractA three-dimensional dynamic cloud model incorporating airflow dynamics, microphysics, and thunderstorm electrification mechanisms is used to simulate the first 3 h of the 29 June 2000 supercell from the Severe Thunderstorm Electrification and Precipitation Study (STEPS). The 29 June storm produced large flash rates, predominately positive cloud-to-ground lightning, large hail, and an F1 tornado. Four different simulations of the storm are made, each one using a different noninductive (NI) charging parameterization. The charge structure, and thus lightning polarity, of the simulated storm is sensitive to the treatment of cloud water dependence in the different NI charging schemes. The results from the simulations are compared with observations from STEPS, including balloon-borne electric field meter soundings and flash locations from the Lightning Mapping Array. For two of the parameterizations, the observed ?inverted? tripolar charge structure is well approximated by the model. The polarity of the ground flashes is opposite that of the lowest charge region of the inverted tripole in both the observed storm and the simulations. Total flash rate is well correlated with graupel volume, updraft volume, and updraft mass flux. However, there is little correlation between total flash rate and maximum updraft speed. Based on the correlations found in both the observed and simulated storm, the total flash rate appears to be most representative of overall storm intensity.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleNumerically Simulated Electrification and Lightning of the 29 June 2000 STEPS Supercell Storm
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume134
    journal issue10
    journal titleMonthly Weather Review
    identifier doi10.1175/MWR3217.1
    journal fristpage2734
    journal lastpage2757
    treeMonthly Weather Review:;2006:;volume( 134 ):;issue: 010
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian