MOS, Perfect Prog, and ReanalysisSource: Monthly Weather Review:;2006:;volume( 134 ):;issue: 002::page 657DOI: 10.1175/MWR3088.1Publisher: American Meteorological Society
Abstract: Statistical postprocessing methods have been successful in correcting many defects inherent in numerical weather prediction model forecasts. Among them, model output statistics (MOS) and perfect prog have been most common, each with its own strengths and weaknesses. Here, an alternative method (called RAN) is examined that combines the two, while at the same time utilizes the information in reanalysis data. The three methods are examined from a purely formal/mathematical point of view. The results suggest that whereas MOS is expected to outperform perfect prog and RAN in terms of mean squared error, bias, and error variance, the RAN approach is expected to yield more certain and bias-free forecasts. It is suggested therefore that a real-time RAN-based postprocessor be developed for further testing.
|
Collections
Show full item record
| contributor author | Marzban, Caren | |
| contributor author | Sandgathe, Scott | |
| contributor author | Kalnay, Eugenia | |
| date accessioned | 2017-06-09T17:27:36Z | |
| date available | 2017-06-09T17:27:36Z | |
| date copyright | 2006/02/01 | |
| date issued | 2006 | |
| identifier issn | 0027-0644 | |
| identifier other | ams-85635.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4229104 | |
| description abstract | Statistical postprocessing methods have been successful in correcting many defects inherent in numerical weather prediction model forecasts. Among them, model output statistics (MOS) and perfect prog have been most common, each with its own strengths and weaknesses. Here, an alternative method (called RAN) is examined that combines the two, while at the same time utilizes the information in reanalysis data. The three methods are examined from a purely formal/mathematical point of view. The results suggest that whereas MOS is expected to outperform perfect prog and RAN in terms of mean squared error, bias, and error variance, the RAN approach is expected to yield more certain and bias-free forecasts. It is suggested therefore that a real-time RAN-based postprocessor be developed for further testing. | |
| publisher | American Meteorological Society | |
| title | MOS, Perfect Prog, and Reanalysis | |
| type | Journal Paper | |
| journal volume | 134 | |
| journal issue | 2 | |
| journal title | Monthly Weather Review | |
| identifier doi | 10.1175/MWR3088.1 | |
| journal fristpage | 657 | |
| journal lastpage | 663 | |
| tree | Monthly Weather Review:;2006:;volume( 134 ):;issue: 002 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext |