YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Monthly Weather Review
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Monthly Weather Review
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    The Santa Cruz Eddy. Part II: Mechanisms of Formation

    Source: Monthly Weather Review:;2005:;volume( 133 ):;issue: 008::page 2387
    Author:
    Archer, Cristina L.
    ,
    Jacobson, Mark Z.
    DOI: 10.1175/MWR2979.1
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: The formation mechanism of the Santa Cruz eddy (SCE) is investigated using the fifth-generation Pennsylvania State University?National Center for Atmospheric Research Mesoscale Model (MM5). Simulations of 25?26 August 2000 showed that two eddy instances formed on that night, a finding supported by observations. The two eddies had similar behavior: they both formed in the sheltered Santa Cruz, California, area and then moved southeastward, to finally dissipate after 7?11 h. However, the first eddy had greater vorticity, wind speed, horizontal and vertical extents, and lifetime than the second eddy. Numerical simulations showed that the SCEs are formed by the interaction of the main northwesterly flow with the topographic barrier represented by the Santa Cruz Mountains to the north of Monterey Bay. Additional numerical experiments were undertaken with no diurnal heating cycle, no (molecular or eddy) viscosity, and no horizontal thermal gradients at ground level. In all cases, vertical vorticity was still created by the tilting of horizontal vorticity generated by the solenoidal term in the vorticity equation. This baroclinic process appeared to be the fundamental formation mechanism for both SCEs, but more favorable conditions in the late afternoon (including a south-to-north pressure gradient, flow turning due to the sea breeze, and an expansion fan) coincided to intensify the first eddy.
    • Download: (3.357Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      The Santa Cruz Eddy. Part II: Mechanisms of Formation

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4228983
    Collections
    • Monthly Weather Review

    Show full item record

    contributor authorArcher, Cristina L.
    contributor authorJacobson, Mark Z.
    date accessioned2017-06-09T17:27:12Z
    date available2017-06-09T17:27:12Z
    date copyright2005/08/01
    date issued2005
    identifier issn0027-0644
    identifier otherams-85526.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4228983
    description abstractThe formation mechanism of the Santa Cruz eddy (SCE) is investigated using the fifth-generation Pennsylvania State University?National Center for Atmospheric Research Mesoscale Model (MM5). Simulations of 25?26 August 2000 showed that two eddy instances formed on that night, a finding supported by observations. The two eddies had similar behavior: they both formed in the sheltered Santa Cruz, California, area and then moved southeastward, to finally dissipate after 7?11 h. However, the first eddy had greater vorticity, wind speed, horizontal and vertical extents, and lifetime than the second eddy. Numerical simulations showed that the SCEs are formed by the interaction of the main northwesterly flow with the topographic barrier represented by the Santa Cruz Mountains to the north of Monterey Bay. Additional numerical experiments were undertaken with no diurnal heating cycle, no (molecular or eddy) viscosity, and no horizontal thermal gradients at ground level. In all cases, vertical vorticity was still created by the tilting of horizontal vorticity generated by the solenoidal term in the vorticity equation. This baroclinic process appeared to be the fundamental formation mechanism for both SCEs, but more favorable conditions in the late afternoon (including a south-to-north pressure gradient, flow turning due to the sea breeze, and an expansion fan) coincided to intensify the first eddy.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleThe Santa Cruz Eddy. Part II: Mechanisms of Formation
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume133
    journal issue8
    journal titleMonthly Weather Review
    identifier doi10.1175/MWR2979.1
    journal fristpage2387
    journal lastpage2405
    treeMonthly Weather Review:;2005:;volume( 133 ):;issue: 008
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian