YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Management in Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Management in Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Innovations to Manage Disputes: DRB and NEC

    Source: Journal of Management in Engineering:;2000:;Volume ( 016 ):;issue: 005
    Author:
    Roxene M. Thompson
    ,
    Michael C. Vorster
    ,
    James P. Groton
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(2000)16:5(51)
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: How do we reduce conflict and litigation in the construction process? On one hand, some industry leaders focus their efforts on improving alternative dispute resolution mechanisms to resolve disputes. For instance, the American Society of Civil Engineers has introduced the Dispute Review Board (DRB) as a complementary provision to standard U.S. construction contracts and practices. On the other hand, other industry leaders focus their efforts toward making fundamental changes to the way construction contracts are written. The Council of the Institution of Civil Engineers in the United Kingdom has introduced the New Engineering Contract (NEC) to the construction industry as an alternative to presently used contracts. Both of these efforts have proved to be effective in improving communication, relationships, and the management and reduction of disputes. This paper explores the philosophy of the DRB and NEC and compares their success stories as approaches to combating adversarial relationships and rising litigation costs in the construction industry.
    • Download: (71.25Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Innovations to Manage Disputes: DRB and NEC

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/42289
    Collections
    • Journal of Management in Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorRoxene M. Thompson
    contributor authorMichael C. Vorster
    contributor authorJames P. Groton
    date accessioned2017-05-08T21:11:41Z
    date available2017-05-08T21:11:41Z
    date copyrightSeptember 2000
    date issued2000
    identifier other%28asce%290742-597x%282000%2916%3A5%2851%29.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/42289
    description abstractHow do we reduce conflict and litigation in the construction process? On one hand, some industry leaders focus their efforts on improving alternative dispute resolution mechanisms to resolve disputes. For instance, the American Society of Civil Engineers has introduced the Dispute Review Board (DRB) as a complementary provision to standard U.S. construction contracts and practices. On the other hand, other industry leaders focus their efforts toward making fundamental changes to the way construction contracts are written. The Council of the Institution of Civil Engineers in the United Kingdom has introduced the New Engineering Contract (NEC) to the construction industry as an alternative to presently used contracts. Both of these efforts have proved to be effective in improving communication, relationships, and the management and reduction of disputes. This paper explores the philosophy of the DRB and NEC and compares their success stories as approaches to combating adversarial relationships and rising litigation costs in the construction industry.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleInnovations to Manage Disputes: DRB and NEC
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume16
    journal issue5
    journal titleJournal of Management in Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(2000)16:5(51)
    treeJournal of Management in Engineering:;2000:;Volume ( 016 ):;issue: 005
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian