YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Monthly Weather Review
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Monthly Weather Review
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    An Ensemble Generation Method for Seasonal Forecasting with an Ocean–Atmosphere Coupled Model

    Source: Monthly Weather Review:;2005:;volume( 133 ):;issue: 002::page 441
    Author:
    Vialard, Jérôme
    ,
    Vitart, Frédéric
    ,
    Balmaseda, Magdalena A.
    ,
    Stockdale, Timothy N.
    ,
    Anderson, David L. T.
    DOI: 10.1175/MWR-2863.1
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: Seasonal forecasts are subject to various types of errors: amplification of errors in oceanic initial conditions, errors due to the unpredictable nature of the synoptic atmospheric variability, and coupled model error. Ensemble forecasting is usually used in an attempt to sample some or all of these various sources of error. How to build an ensemble forecasting system in the seasonal range remains a largely unexplored area. In this paper, various ensemble generation methodologies for the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) seasonal forecasting system are compared. A series of experiments using wind perturbations (applied when generating the oceanic initial conditions), sea surface temperature (SST) perturbations to those initial conditions, and random perturbation to the atmosphere during the forecast, individually and collectively, is presented and compared with the more usual lagged-average approach. SST perturbations are important during the first 2 months of the forecast to ensure a spread at least equal to the uncertainty level on the SST measure. From month 3 onward, all methods give a similar spread. This spread is significantly smaller than the rms error of the forecasts. There is also no clear link between the spread of the ensemble and the ensemble mean forecast error. These two facts suggest that factors not presently sampled in the ensemble, such as model error, act to limit the forecast skill. Methods that allow sampling of model error, such as multimodel ensembles, should be beneficial to seasonal forecasting.
    • Download: (549.7Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      An Ensemble Generation Method for Seasonal Forecasting with an Ocean–Atmosphere Coupled Model

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4228855
    Collections
    • Monthly Weather Review

    Show full item record

    contributor authorVialard, Jérôme
    contributor authorVitart, Frédéric
    contributor authorBalmaseda, Magdalena A.
    contributor authorStockdale, Timothy N.
    contributor authorAnderson, David L. T.
    date accessioned2017-06-09T17:26:44Z
    date available2017-06-09T17:26:44Z
    date copyright2005/02/01
    date issued2005
    identifier issn0027-0644
    identifier otherams-85411.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4228855
    description abstractSeasonal forecasts are subject to various types of errors: amplification of errors in oceanic initial conditions, errors due to the unpredictable nature of the synoptic atmospheric variability, and coupled model error. Ensemble forecasting is usually used in an attempt to sample some or all of these various sources of error. How to build an ensemble forecasting system in the seasonal range remains a largely unexplored area. In this paper, various ensemble generation methodologies for the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) seasonal forecasting system are compared. A series of experiments using wind perturbations (applied when generating the oceanic initial conditions), sea surface temperature (SST) perturbations to those initial conditions, and random perturbation to the atmosphere during the forecast, individually and collectively, is presented and compared with the more usual lagged-average approach. SST perturbations are important during the first 2 months of the forecast to ensure a spread at least equal to the uncertainty level on the SST measure. From month 3 onward, all methods give a similar spread. This spread is significantly smaller than the rms error of the forecasts. There is also no clear link between the spread of the ensemble and the ensemble mean forecast error. These two facts suggest that factors not presently sampled in the ensemble, such as model error, act to limit the forecast skill. Methods that allow sampling of model error, such as multimodel ensembles, should be beneficial to seasonal forecasting.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleAn Ensemble Generation Method for Seasonal Forecasting with an Ocean–Atmosphere Coupled Model
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume133
    journal issue2
    journal titleMonthly Weather Review
    identifier doi10.1175/MWR-2863.1
    journal fristpage441
    journal lastpage453
    treeMonthly Weather Review:;2005:;volume( 133 ):;issue: 002
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian