YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    On the Impacts of Different Definitions of Maximum Dimension for Nonspherical Particles Recorded by 2D Imaging Probes

    Source: Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology:;2016:;volume( 033 ):;issue: 005::page 1057
    Author:
    Wu, Wei
    ,
    McFarquhar, Greg M.
    DOI: 10.1175/JTECH-D-15-0177.1
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: nowledge of ice crystal particle size distributions (PSDs) is critical for parameterization schemes for atmospheric models and remote sensing retrieval schemes. Two-dimensional in situ images captured by cloud imaging probes are widely used to derive PSDs in term of maximum particle dimension . In this study, different definitions of for nonspherical particles recorded by 2D probes are compared. It is shown that the derived PSDs can differ by up to a factor of 6 for ?m and mm. The large differences for ?m are caused by the strong dependence of sample volume on particle size, whereas differences for mm are caused by the small number of particles detected. Derived bulk properties can also vary depending on the definitions of because of discrepancies in the definition of used to characterize the PSDs and that used to describe the properties of individual ice crystals. For example, the mass-weighted mean diameter can vary by 2 times, the ice water content (IWC) by 3 times, and the mass-weighted terminal velocity by 6 times. Therefore, a consistent definition of should be used for all data and single-particle properties. As an invariant measure with respect to the orientation of particles in the imaging plane for 2D probes, the diameter of the smallest circle enclosing the particle is recommended as the optimal definition of . If the 3D structure of a particle is observed, then the technique can be extended to determine the minimum enclosing sphere.
    • Download: (1.573Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      On the Impacts of Different Definitions of Maximum Dimension for Nonspherical Particles Recorded by 2D Imaging Probes

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4228712
    Collections
    • Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology

    Show full item record

    contributor authorWu, Wei
    contributor authorMcFarquhar, Greg M.
    date accessioned2017-06-09T17:26:20Z
    date available2017-06-09T17:26:20Z
    date copyright2016/05/01
    date issued2016
    identifier issn0739-0572
    identifier otherams-85282.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4228712
    description abstractnowledge of ice crystal particle size distributions (PSDs) is critical for parameterization schemes for atmospheric models and remote sensing retrieval schemes. Two-dimensional in situ images captured by cloud imaging probes are widely used to derive PSDs in term of maximum particle dimension . In this study, different definitions of for nonspherical particles recorded by 2D probes are compared. It is shown that the derived PSDs can differ by up to a factor of 6 for ?m and mm. The large differences for ?m are caused by the strong dependence of sample volume on particle size, whereas differences for mm are caused by the small number of particles detected. Derived bulk properties can also vary depending on the definitions of because of discrepancies in the definition of used to characterize the PSDs and that used to describe the properties of individual ice crystals. For example, the mass-weighted mean diameter can vary by 2 times, the ice water content (IWC) by 3 times, and the mass-weighted terminal velocity by 6 times. Therefore, a consistent definition of should be used for all data and single-particle properties. As an invariant measure with respect to the orientation of particles in the imaging plane for 2D probes, the diameter of the smallest circle enclosing the particle is recommended as the optimal definition of . If the 3D structure of a particle is observed, then the technique can be extended to determine the minimum enclosing sphere.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleOn the Impacts of Different Definitions of Maximum Dimension for Nonspherical Particles Recorded by 2D Imaging Probes
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume33
    journal issue5
    journal titleJournal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology
    identifier doi10.1175/JTECH-D-15-0177.1
    journal fristpage1057
    journal lastpage1072
    treeJournal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology:;2016:;volume( 033 ):;issue: 005
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian