YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Results from the NASA GSFC and LaRC Ozone Lidar Intercomparison: New Mobile Tools for Atmospheric Research

    Source: Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology:;2015:;volume( 032 ):;issue: 010::page 1779
    Author:
    Sullivan, John T.
    ,
    McGee, Thomas J.
    ,
    DeYoung, Russell
    ,
    Twigg, Laurence W.
    ,
    Sumnicht, Grant K.
    ,
    Pliutau, Denis
    ,
    Knepp, Travis
    ,
    Carrion, William
    DOI: 10.1175/JTECH-D-14-00193.1
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: uring a 2-week period in May 2014, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Goddard Space Flight Center Tropospheric Ozone Differential Absorption Lidar (GSFC TROPOZ DIAL) was situated near the NASA Langley Research Center (LaRC) Mobile Ozone Lidar (LMOL) and made simultaneous measurements for a continuous 15-h observation period in which six separate ozonesondes were launched to provide reference ozone profiles. Although each of these campaign-ready lidars has very different transmitter and receiver components, they produced very similar ozone profiles, which were mostly within 10% of each other and the ozonesondes. The observed column averages as compared to the ozonesondes also agree well and are within 8% of each other. A robust uncertainty analysis was performed, and the results indicate that there is no statistically significant systematic bias between the TROPOZ and LMOL instruments. With the extended measurements and ozonesonde launches, this intercomparison has yielded an in-depth evaluation of the precision and accuracy of the two new lidars. This intercomparison is also the first (to the best of the authors? knowledge) reported measurement intercomparison of two ground-based tropospheric ozone lidar systems within the United States.
    • Download: (3.855Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Results from the NASA GSFC and LaRC Ozone Lidar Intercomparison: New Mobile Tools for Atmospheric Research

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4228607
    Collections
    • Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology

    Show full item record

    contributor authorSullivan, John T.
    contributor authorMcGee, Thomas J.
    contributor authorDeYoung, Russell
    contributor authorTwigg, Laurence W.
    contributor authorSumnicht, Grant K.
    contributor authorPliutau, Denis
    contributor authorKnepp, Travis
    contributor authorCarrion, William
    date accessioned2017-06-09T17:26:03Z
    date available2017-06-09T17:26:03Z
    date copyright2015/10/01
    date issued2015
    identifier issn0739-0572
    identifier otherams-85188.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4228607
    description abstracturing a 2-week period in May 2014, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Goddard Space Flight Center Tropospheric Ozone Differential Absorption Lidar (GSFC TROPOZ DIAL) was situated near the NASA Langley Research Center (LaRC) Mobile Ozone Lidar (LMOL) and made simultaneous measurements for a continuous 15-h observation period in which six separate ozonesondes were launched to provide reference ozone profiles. Although each of these campaign-ready lidars has very different transmitter and receiver components, they produced very similar ozone profiles, which were mostly within 10% of each other and the ozonesondes. The observed column averages as compared to the ozonesondes also agree well and are within 8% of each other. A robust uncertainty analysis was performed, and the results indicate that there is no statistically significant systematic bias between the TROPOZ and LMOL instruments. With the extended measurements and ozonesonde launches, this intercomparison has yielded an in-depth evaluation of the precision and accuracy of the two new lidars. This intercomparison is also the first (to the best of the authors? knowledge) reported measurement intercomparison of two ground-based tropospheric ozone lidar systems within the United States.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleResults from the NASA GSFC and LaRC Ozone Lidar Intercomparison: New Mobile Tools for Atmospheric Research
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume32
    journal issue10
    journal titleJournal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology
    identifier doi10.1175/JTECH-D-14-00193.1
    journal fristpage1779
    journal lastpage1795
    treeJournal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology:;2015:;volume( 032 ):;issue: 010
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian