YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Evaluation of the FlowCapt Acoustic Sensor for the Aeolian Transport of Snow

    Source: Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology:;2015:;volume( 032 ):;issue: 009::page 1630
    Author:
    Trouvilliez, Alexandre
    ,
    Naaim-Bouvet, Florence
    ,
    Bellot, Hervé
    ,
    Genthon, Christophe
    ,
    Gallée, Hubert
    DOI: 10.1175/JTECH-D-14-00104.1
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: lowCapt acoustic sensors, designed for measuring the aeolian transport of snow fluxes, are compared to the snow particle counter S7optical sensor, considered herein as the reference. They were compared in the French Alps at the Lac Blanc Pass, where a bench test for the aeolian transport of snow was set up. The two existing generations of FlowCapt are compared. Both seem to be good detectors for the aeolian transport of snow, especially for transport events with a flux above 1 g m?2 s?1. The second-generation FlowCapt is also compared in terms of quantification. The aeolian snow mass fluxes and snow quantity transported recorded by the second-generation FlowCapt are close to the integrative snow particle counter S7 fluxes for an event without precipitation, but they are underestimated when an event with precipitation is considered. When the winter season is considered, for integrative snow particle counter S7 fluxes above 20 g m?2 s?1, the second-generation FlowCapt fluxes are underestimated, regardless of precipitation. In conclusion, both generations of FlowCapt can be used as a drifting snow detector and the second generation can record an underestimation of the quantity of snow transported at one location: over the winter season, the quantity of snow transported recorded by the SPC is between 4 and 6 times greater than the quantity recorded by the second-generation FlowCapt.
    • Download: (2.067Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Evaluation of the FlowCapt Acoustic Sensor for the Aeolian Transport of Snow

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4228544
    Collections
    • Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology

    Show full item record

    contributor authorTrouvilliez, Alexandre
    contributor authorNaaim-Bouvet, Florence
    contributor authorBellot, Hervé
    contributor authorGenthon, Christophe
    contributor authorGallée, Hubert
    date accessioned2017-06-09T17:25:54Z
    date available2017-06-09T17:25:54Z
    date copyright2015/09/01
    date issued2015
    identifier issn0739-0572
    identifier otherams-85131.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4228544
    description abstractlowCapt acoustic sensors, designed for measuring the aeolian transport of snow fluxes, are compared to the snow particle counter S7optical sensor, considered herein as the reference. They were compared in the French Alps at the Lac Blanc Pass, where a bench test for the aeolian transport of snow was set up. The two existing generations of FlowCapt are compared. Both seem to be good detectors for the aeolian transport of snow, especially for transport events with a flux above 1 g m?2 s?1. The second-generation FlowCapt is also compared in terms of quantification. The aeolian snow mass fluxes and snow quantity transported recorded by the second-generation FlowCapt are close to the integrative snow particle counter S7 fluxes for an event without precipitation, but they are underestimated when an event with precipitation is considered. When the winter season is considered, for integrative snow particle counter S7 fluxes above 20 g m?2 s?1, the second-generation FlowCapt fluxes are underestimated, regardless of precipitation. In conclusion, both generations of FlowCapt can be used as a drifting snow detector and the second generation can record an underestimation of the quantity of snow transported at one location: over the winter season, the quantity of snow transported recorded by the SPC is between 4 and 6 times greater than the quantity recorded by the second-generation FlowCapt.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleEvaluation of the FlowCapt Acoustic Sensor for the Aeolian Transport of Snow
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume32
    journal issue9
    journal titleJournal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology
    identifier doi10.1175/JTECH-D-14-00104.1
    journal fristpage1630
    journal lastpage1641
    treeJournal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology:;2015:;volume( 032 ):;issue: 009
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian