YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    An Intercomparison of Acoustic Current Meter Measurements in Low to Moderate Flow Regions

    Source: Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology:;2013:;volume( 030 ):;issue: 008::page 1924
    Author:
    Drozdowski, Adam
    ,
    Greenan, Blair J. W.
    DOI: 10.1175/JTECH-D-12-00198.1
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: nstrumented, subsurface moorings deployed in the Scotian shelf and slope regions of the North Atlantic provide data in low to moderate flows for a current meter intercomparison. The primary instruments being evaluated are two acoustic Doppler single-point current meters, the Aanderaa Seaguard (SG) and the Teledyne RD Instruments (RDI) Doppler volume sampler (DVS), which are compared against older-generation single-point current meters and acoustic Doppler current profilers. Analysis showed that the root-mean-square (RMS) of the speed difference between concurrent instrument combinations was in the range of 1.0?1.6 cm s?1, which is about 3%?6% of the upper limit of speeds observed at these sites. Best agreement was between the DVS and the nearby Seaguard (RMS speed difference of 1.2 cm s?1), during the shelf deployment, and between the Aanderaa recording current meter 11 (RCM11) and the nearby Seaguard (1.0 cm s?1), during the slope deployment. Speed differences larger than 4 cm s?1 were uncommon, occurring less than 1.5% of the time. Slight overspeeding of one of the Seaguards is traced to an intentional alteration in the instruments' sampling strategy. The DVS compass had a slight meandering tendency that caused it to routinely disagree with other instruments by as much as 15° for hours at a time. The disagreement was random in direction and had no impact on most of the comparisons, but it did produce a 15% smaller magnitude of mean current. Subsequent to this field test, Teledyne RDI redesigned the DVS and replaced the compass with a new sensor.
    • Download: (3.611Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      An Intercomparison of Acoustic Current Meter Measurements in Low to Moderate Flow Regions

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4228192
    Collections
    • Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology

    Show full item record

    contributor authorDrozdowski, Adam
    contributor authorGreenan, Blair J. W.
    date accessioned2017-06-09T17:24:57Z
    date available2017-06-09T17:24:57Z
    date copyright2013/08/01
    date issued2013
    identifier issn0739-0572
    identifier otherams-84814.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4228192
    description abstractnstrumented, subsurface moorings deployed in the Scotian shelf and slope regions of the North Atlantic provide data in low to moderate flows for a current meter intercomparison. The primary instruments being evaluated are two acoustic Doppler single-point current meters, the Aanderaa Seaguard (SG) and the Teledyne RD Instruments (RDI) Doppler volume sampler (DVS), which are compared against older-generation single-point current meters and acoustic Doppler current profilers. Analysis showed that the root-mean-square (RMS) of the speed difference between concurrent instrument combinations was in the range of 1.0?1.6 cm s?1, which is about 3%?6% of the upper limit of speeds observed at these sites. Best agreement was between the DVS and the nearby Seaguard (RMS speed difference of 1.2 cm s?1), during the shelf deployment, and between the Aanderaa recording current meter 11 (RCM11) and the nearby Seaguard (1.0 cm s?1), during the slope deployment. Speed differences larger than 4 cm s?1 were uncommon, occurring less than 1.5% of the time. Slight overspeeding of one of the Seaguards is traced to an intentional alteration in the instruments' sampling strategy. The DVS compass had a slight meandering tendency that caused it to routinely disagree with other instruments by as much as 15° for hours at a time. The disagreement was random in direction and had no impact on most of the comparisons, but it did produce a 15% smaller magnitude of mean current. Subsequent to this field test, Teledyne RDI redesigned the DVS and replaced the compass with a new sensor.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleAn Intercomparison of Acoustic Current Meter Measurements in Low to Moderate Flow Regions
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume30
    journal issue8
    journal titleJournal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology
    identifier doi10.1175/JTECH-D-12-00198.1
    journal fristpage1924
    journal lastpage1939
    treeJournal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology:;2013:;volume( 030 ):;issue: 008
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian