YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Comparison of Thermal Variance Dissipation Rates from Moored and Profiling Instruments at the Equator

    Source: Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology:;2012:;volume( 029 ):;issue: 009::page 1347
    Author:
    Perlin, A.
    ,
    Moum, J. N.
    DOI: 10.1175/JTECH-D-12-00019.1
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: s a quantitative test of moored mixing measurements using ?pods, a comparison experiment was conducted at 0°, 140°W in October?November 2008. The following three measurement elements were involved: (i) NOAA?s Tropical Atmosphere Ocean (TAO) mooring with five ?pods, (ii) a similar mooring 9 km away with seven ?pods, and (iii) Chameleon turbulence profiles at an intermediate location.Dissipation rates of temperature variance and turbulent kinetic energy are compared. In all but 3 of 17 direct comparisons 15-day mean values of ?T agreed within 95% bootstrap confidence limits computed with the conservative assumption that individual 1-min ?pod averages and individual Chameleon profiles are independent. However, significant mean differences occur on 2-day averages. Averaging in time reduces the range (95%) in the observed differences at two locations from a factor of 17 at 1-day averaging time to less than a factor of 2 at 15 days, presumably reflecting the natural variability in both the turbulence and the small-scale fluid dynamics that lead to instability and turbulence.The motion of ?pod on a mooring beneath a surface buoy is complex and requires a complete motion package to define in detail. However, perfect knowledge of the motion of the sensor tip is not necessary to obtain a reasonable measure of ?T. A sampling test indicated that the most important motion sensor is a pressure sensor sampled rapidly enough to resolve the surface wave?induced motion.
    • Download: (12.28Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Comparison of Thermal Variance Dissipation Rates from Moored and Profiling Instruments at the Equator

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4228047
    Collections
    • Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology

    Show full item record

    contributor authorPerlin, A.
    contributor authorMoum, J. N.
    date accessioned2017-06-09T17:24:27Z
    date available2017-06-09T17:24:27Z
    date copyright2012/09/01
    date issued2012
    identifier issn0739-0572
    identifier otherams-84684.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4228047
    description abstracts a quantitative test of moored mixing measurements using ?pods, a comparison experiment was conducted at 0°, 140°W in October?November 2008. The following three measurement elements were involved: (i) NOAA?s Tropical Atmosphere Ocean (TAO) mooring with five ?pods, (ii) a similar mooring 9 km away with seven ?pods, and (iii) Chameleon turbulence profiles at an intermediate location.Dissipation rates of temperature variance and turbulent kinetic energy are compared. In all but 3 of 17 direct comparisons 15-day mean values of ?T agreed within 95% bootstrap confidence limits computed with the conservative assumption that individual 1-min ?pod averages and individual Chameleon profiles are independent. However, significant mean differences occur on 2-day averages. Averaging in time reduces the range (95%) in the observed differences at two locations from a factor of 17 at 1-day averaging time to less than a factor of 2 at 15 days, presumably reflecting the natural variability in both the turbulence and the small-scale fluid dynamics that lead to instability and turbulence.The motion of ?pod on a mooring beneath a surface buoy is complex and requires a complete motion package to define in detail. However, perfect knowledge of the motion of the sensor tip is not necessary to obtain a reasonable measure of ?T. A sampling test indicated that the most important motion sensor is a pressure sensor sampled rapidly enough to resolve the surface wave?induced motion.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleComparison of Thermal Variance Dissipation Rates from Moored and Profiling Instruments at the Equator
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume29
    journal issue9
    journal titleJournal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology
    identifier doi10.1175/JTECH-D-12-00019.1
    journal fristpage1347
    journal lastpage1362
    treeJournal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology:;2012:;volume( 029 ):;issue: 009
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian