YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Comparison between the TOPAZ Airborne Ozone Lidar and In Situ Measurements during TexAQS 2006

    Source: Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology:;2011:;volume( 028 ):;issue: 010::page 1243
    Author:
    Langford, A. O.
    ,
    Senff, C. J.
    ,
    Alvarez, R. J.
    ,
    Banta, R. M.
    ,
    Hardesty, R. M.
    ,
    Parrish, D. D.
    ,
    Ryerson, T. B.
    DOI: 10.1175/JTECH-D-10-05043.1
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: he NOAA airborne ozone lidar system [Tunable Optical Profiler for Aerosol and Ozone (TOPAZ)] is compared with the fast-response chemiluminescence sensor flown aboard the NOAA WP-3D during the 2006 Texas Air Quality Study (TexAQS). TOPAZ measurements made from the NOAA Twin Otter, flying at an altitude of ~3300 m MSL in the Houston, Texas, area on 31 August, and the Dallas, Texas, area on 13 September, show that the overall uncertainty in the 10-s (~600-m horizontal resolution) TOPAZ profiles is dominated by statistical uncertainties (1σ) of ~8 ppbv (6%?10%) at ranges of ~2300 m from the aircraft (~1000 m MSL), and ~11?27 ppbv (12%?30%) at ranges of ~2800 m (~500 m MSL). These uncertainties are substantially reduced by spatial averaging, and the averages of 11 profiles (of 110 s or 6.6-km horizontal resolution) at ~1000 m MSL are in excellent agreement (±2%) with the in situ measurements at ~500 m MSL. The TOPAZ measurements at lower altitudes on 31 August exhibit a negative bias of up to ~15%, however, when the lidar signals were strongly attenuated by very high ozone levels in the plume from the Houston Ship Channel. This bias appears to result from nonlinear behavior in the TOPAZ signal amplifiers, which is described in the companion paper by Alvarez et al. An empirical correction is presented.
    • Download: (3.918Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Comparison between the TOPAZ Airborne Ozone Lidar and In Situ Measurements during TexAQS 2006

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4227851
    Collections
    • Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology

    Show full item record

    contributor authorLangford, A. O.
    contributor authorSenff, C. J.
    contributor authorAlvarez, R. J.
    contributor authorBanta, R. M.
    contributor authorHardesty, R. M.
    contributor authorParrish, D. D.
    contributor authorRyerson, T. B.
    date accessioned2017-06-09T17:23:52Z
    date available2017-06-09T17:23:52Z
    date copyright2011/10/01
    date issued2011
    identifier issn0739-0572
    identifier otherams-84507.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4227851
    description abstracthe NOAA airborne ozone lidar system [Tunable Optical Profiler for Aerosol and Ozone (TOPAZ)] is compared with the fast-response chemiluminescence sensor flown aboard the NOAA WP-3D during the 2006 Texas Air Quality Study (TexAQS). TOPAZ measurements made from the NOAA Twin Otter, flying at an altitude of ~3300 m MSL in the Houston, Texas, area on 31 August, and the Dallas, Texas, area on 13 September, show that the overall uncertainty in the 10-s (~600-m horizontal resolution) TOPAZ profiles is dominated by statistical uncertainties (1σ) of ~8 ppbv (6%?10%) at ranges of ~2300 m from the aircraft (~1000 m MSL), and ~11?27 ppbv (12%?30%) at ranges of ~2800 m (~500 m MSL). These uncertainties are substantially reduced by spatial averaging, and the averages of 11 profiles (of 110 s or 6.6-km horizontal resolution) at ~1000 m MSL are in excellent agreement (±2%) with the in situ measurements at ~500 m MSL. The TOPAZ measurements at lower altitudes on 31 August exhibit a negative bias of up to ~15%, however, when the lidar signals were strongly attenuated by very high ozone levels in the plume from the Houston Ship Channel. This bias appears to result from nonlinear behavior in the TOPAZ signal amplifiers, which is described in the companion paper by Alvarez et al. An empirical correction is presented.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleComparison between the TOPAZ Airborne Ozone Lidar and In Situ Measurements during TexAQS 2006
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume28
    journal issue10
    journal titleJournal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology
    identifier doi10.1175/JTECH-D-10-05043.1
    journal fristpage1243
    journal lastpage1257
    treeJournal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology:;2011:;volume( 028 ):;issue: 010
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian