Comparison between the TOPAZ Airborne Ozone Lidar and In Situ Measurements during TexAQS 2006Source: Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology:;2011:;volume( 028 ):;issue: 010::page 1243Author:Langford, A. O.
,
Senff, C. J.
,
Alvarez, R. J.
,
Banta, R. M.
,
Hardesty, R. M.
,
Parrish, D. D.
,
Ryerson, T. B.
DOI: 10.1175/JTECH-D-10-05043.1Publisher: American Meteorological Society
Abstract: he NOAA airborne ozone lidar system [Tunable Optical Profiler for Aerosol and Ozone (TOPAZ)] is compared with the fast-response chemiluminescence sensor flown aboard the NOAA WP-3D during the 2006 Texas Air Quality Study (TexAQS). TOPAZ measurements made from the NOAA Twin Otter, flying at an altitude of ~3300 m MSL in the Houston, Texas, area on 31 August, and the Dallas, Texas, area on 13 September, show that the overall uncertainty in the 10-s (~600-m horizontal resolution) TOPAZ profiles is dominated by statistical uncertainties (1σ) of ~8 ppbv (6%?10%) at ranges of ~2300 m from the aircraft (~1000 m MSL), and ~11?27 ppbv (12%?30%) at ranges of ~2800 m (~500 m MSL). These uncertainties are substantially reduced by spatial averaging, and the averages of 11 profiles (of 110 s or 6.6-km horizontal resolution) at ~1000 m MSL are in excellent agreement (±2%) with the in situ measurements at ~500 m MSL. The TOPAZ measurements at lower altitudes on 31 August exhibit a negative bias of up to ~15%, however, when the lidar signals were strongly attenuated by very high ozone levels in the plume from the Houston Ship Channel. This bias appears to result from nonlinear behavior in the TOPAZ signal amplifiers, which is described in the companion paper by Alvarez et al. An empirical correction is presented.
|
Collections
Show full item record
contributor author | Langford, A. O. | |
contributor author | Senff, C. J. | |
contributor author | Alvarez, R. J. | |
contributor author | Banta, R. M. | |
contributor author | Hardesty, R. M. | |
contributor author | Parrish, D. D. | |
contributor author | Ryerson, T. B. | |
date accessioned | 2017-06-09T17:23:52Z | |
date available | 2017-06-09T17:23:52Z | |
date copyright | 2011/10/01 | |
date issued | 2011 | |
identifier issn | 0739-0572 | |
identifier other | ams-84507.pdf | |
identifier uri | http://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4227851 | |
description abstract | he NOAA airborne ozone lidar system [Tunable Optical Profiler for Aerosol and Ozone (TOPAZ)] is compared with the fast-response chemiluminescence sensor flown aboard the NOAA WP-3D during the 2006 Texas Air Quality Study (TexAQS). TOPAZ measurements made from the NOAA Twin Otter, flying at an altitude of ~3300 m MSL in the Houston, Texas, area on 31 August, and the Dallas, Texas, area on 13 September, show that the overall uncertainty in the 10-s (~600-m horizontal resolution) TOPAZ profiles is dominated by statistical uncertainties (1σ) of ~8 ppbv (6%?10%) at ranges of ~2300 m from the aircraft (~1000 m MSL), and ~11?27 ppbv (12%?30%) at ranges of ~2800 m (~500 m MSL). These uncertainties are substantially reduced by spatial averaging, and the averages of 11 profiles (of 110 s or 6.6-km horizontal resolution) at ~1000 m MSL are in excellent agreement (±2%) with the in situ measurements at ~500 m MSL. The TOPAZ measurements at lower altitudes on 31 August exhibit a negative bias of up to ~15%, however, when the lidar signals were strongly attenuated by very high ozone levels in the plume from the Houston Ship Channel. This bias appears to result from nonlinear behavior in the TOPAZ signal amplifiers, which is described in the companion paper by Alvarez et al. An empirical correction is presented. | |
publisher | American Meteorological Society | |
title | Comparison between the TOPAZ Airborne Ozone Lidar and In Situ Measurements during TexAQS 2006 | |
type | Journal Paper | |
journal volume | 28 | |
journal issue | 10 | |
journal title | Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology | |
identifier doi | 10.1175/JTECH-D-10-05043.1 | |
journal fristpage | 1243 | |
journal lastpage | 1257 | |
tree | Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology:;2011:;volume( 028 ):;issue: 010 | |
contenttype | Fulltext |