YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Angular Distribution Models for Top-of-Atmosphere Radiative Flux Estimation from the Clouds and the Earth’s Radiant Energy System Instrument on the Terra Satellite. Part II: Validation

    Source: Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology:;2007:;volume( 024 ):;issue: 004::page 564
    Author:
    Loeb, Norman G.
    ,
    Kato, Seiji
    ,
    Loukachine, Konstantin
    ,
    Manalo-Smith, Natividad
    ,
    Doelling, David R.
    DOI: 10.1175/JTECH1983.1
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: Errors in top-of-atmosphere (TOA) radiative fluxes from the Clouds and the Earth?s Radiant Energy System (CERES) instrument due to uncertainties in radiance-to-flux conversion from CERES Terra angular distribution models (ADMs) are evaluated through a series of consistency tests. These tests show that the overall bias in regional monthly mean shortwave (SW) TOA flux is less than 0.2 W m?2 and the regional RMS error ranges from 0.70 to 1.4 W m?2. In contrast, SW TOA fluxes inferred using theoretical ADMs that assume clouds are plane parallel are overestimated by 3?4 W m?2 and exhibit a strong latitudinal dependence. In the longwave (LW), the bias error ranges from 0.2 to 0.4 W m?2 and regional RMS errors remain smaller than 0.7 W m?2. Global mean albedos derived from ADMs developed during the Earth Radiation Budget Experiment (ERBE) and applied to CERES measurements show a systematic increase with viewing zenith angle of 4%?8%, while albedos from the CERES Terra ADMs show a smaller increase of 1%?2%. The LW fluxes from the ERBE ADMs show a systematic decrease with viewing zenith angle of 2%?2.4%, whereas fluxes from the CERES Terra ADMs remain within 0.7%?0.8% at all angles. Based on several months of multiangle CERES along-track data, the SW TOA flux consistency between nadir- and oblique-viewing zenith angles is generally 5% (<17 W m?2) over land and ocean and 9% (26 W m?2) in polar regions, and LW TOA flux consistency is approximate 3% (7 W m?2) over all surfaces. Based on these results and a theoretically derived conversion between TOA flux consistency and TOA flux error, the best estimate of the error in CERES TOA flux due to the radiance-to-flux conversion is 3% (10 W m?2) in the SW and 1.8% (3?5 W m?2) in the LW. Monthly mean TOA fluxes based on ERBE ADMs are larger than monthly mean TOA fluxes based on CERES Terra ADMs by 1.8 and 1.3 W m?2 in the SW and LW, respectively.
    • Download: (2.486Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Angular Distribution Models for Top-of-Atmosphere Radiative Flux Estimation from the Clouds and the Earth’s Radiant Energy System Instrument on the Terra Satellite. Part II: Validation

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4227695
    Collections
    • Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology

    Show full item record

    contributor authorLoeb, Norman G.
    contributor authorKato, Seiji
    contributor authorLoukachine, Konstantin
    contributor authorManalo-Smith, Natividad
    contributor authorDoelling, David R.
    date accessioned2017-06-09T17:23:27Z
    date available2017-06-09T17:23:27Z
    date copyright2007/04/01
    date issued2007
    identifier issn0739-0572
    identifier otherams-84367.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4227695
    description abstractErrors in top-of-atmosphere (TOA) radiative fluxes from the Clouds and the Earth?s Radiant Energy System (CERES) instrument due to uncertainties in radiance-to-flux conversion from CERES Terra angular distribution models (ADMs) are evaluated through a series of consistency tests. These tests show that the overall bias in regional monthly mean shortwave (SW) TOA flux is less than 0.2 W m?2 and the regional RMS error ranges from 0.70 to 1.4 W m?2. In contrast, SW TOA fluxes inferred using theoretical ADMs that assume clouds are plane parallel are overestimated by 3?4 W m?2 and exhibit a strong latitudinal dependence. In the longwave (LW), the bias error ranges from 0.2 to 0.4 W m?2 and regional RMS errors remain smaller than 0.7 W m?2. Global mean albedos derived from ADMs developed during the Earth Radiation Budget Experiment (ERBE) and applied to CERES measurements show a systematic increase with viewing zenith angle of 4%?8%, while albedos from the CERES Terra ADMs show a smaller increase of 1%?2%. The LW fluxes from the ERBE ADMs show a systematic decrease with viewing zenith angle of 2%?2.4%, whereas fluxes from the CERES Terra ADMs remain within 0.7%?0.8% at all angles. Based on several months of multiangle CERES along-track data, the SW TOA flux consistency between nadir- and oblique-viewing zenith angles is generally 5% (<17 W m?2) over land and ocean and 9% (26 W m?2) in polar regions, and LW TOA flux consistency is approximate 3% (7 W m?2) over all surfaces. Based on these results and a theoretically derived conversion between TOA flux consistency and TOA flux error, the best estimate of the error in CERES TOA flux due to the radiance-to-flux conversion is 3% (10 W m?2) in the SW and 1.8% (3?5 W m?2) in the LW. Monthly mean TOA fluxes based on ERBE ADMs are larger than monthly mean TOA fluxes based on CERES Terra ADMs by 1.8 and 1.3 W m?2 in the SW and LW, respectively.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleAngular Distribution Models for Top-of-Atmosphere Radiative Flux Estimation from the Clouds and the Earth’s Radiant Energy System Instrument on the Terra Satellite. Part II: Validation
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume24
    journal issue4
    journal titleJournal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology
    identifier doi10.1175/JTECH1983.1
    journal fristpage564
    journal lastpage584
    treeJournal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology:;2007:;volume( 024 ):;issue: 004
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian