YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Algorithms for Density, Potential Temperature, Conservative Temperature, and the Freezing Temperature of Seawater

    Source: Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology:;2006:;volume( 023 ):;issue: 012::page 1709
    Author:
    Jackett, David R.
    ,
    McDougall, Trevor J.
    ,
    Feistel, Rainer
    ,
    Wright, Daniel G.
    ,
    Griffies, Stephen M.
    DOI: 10.1175/JTECH1946.1
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: Algorithms are presented for density, potential temperature, conservative temperature, and the freezing temperature of seawater. The algorithms for potential temperature and density (in terms of potential temperature) are updates to routines recently published by McDougall et al., while the algorithms involving conservative temperature and the freezing temperatures of seawater are new. The McDougall et al. algorithms were based on the thermodynamic potential of Feistel and Hagen; the algorithms in this study are all based on the ?new extended Gibbs thermodynamic potential of seawater? of Feistel. The algorithm for the computation of density in terms of salinity, pressure, and conservative temperature produces errors in density and in the corresponding thermal expansion coefficient of the same order as errors for the density equation using potential temperature, both being twice as accurate as the International Equation of State when compared with Feistel?s new equation of state. An inverse function relating potential temperature to conservative temperature is also provided. The difference between practical salinity and absolute salinity is discussed, and it is shown that the present practice of essentially ignoring the difference between these two different salinities is unlikely to cause significant errors in ocean models.
    • Download: (1.347Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Algorithms for Density, Potential Temperature, Conservative Temperature, and the Freezing Temperature of Seawater

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4227654
    Collections
    • Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology

    Show full item record

    contributor authorJackett, David R.
    contributor authorMcDougall, Trevor J.
    contributor authorFeistel, Rainer
    contributor authorWright, Daniel G.
    contributor authorGriffies, Stephen M.
    date accessioned2017-06-09T17:23:21Z
    date available2017-06-09T17:23:21Z
    date copyright2006/12/01
    date issued2006
    identifier issn0739-0572
    identifier otherams-84330.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4227654
    description abstractAlgorithms are presented for density, potential temperature, conservative temperature, and the freezing temperature of seawater. The algorithms for potential temperature and density (in terms of potential temperature) are updates to routines recently published by McDougall et al., while the algorithms involving conservative temperature and the freezing temperatures of seawater are new. The McDougall et al. algorithms were based on the thermodynamic potential of Feistel and Hagen; the algorithms in this study are all based on the ?new extended Gibbs thermodynamic potential of seawater? of Feistel. The algorithm for the computation of density in terms of salinity, pressure, and conservative temperature produces errors in density and in the corresponding thermal expansion coefficient of the same order as errors for the density equation using potential temperature, both being twice as accurate as the International Equation of State when compared with Feistel?s new equation of state. An inverse function relating potential temperature to conservative temperature is also provided. The difference between practical salinity and absolute salinity is discussed, and it is shown that the present practice of essentially ignoring the difference between these two different salinities is unlikely to cause significant errors in ocean models.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleAlgorithms for Density, Potential Temperature, Conservative Temperature, and the Freezing Temperature of Seawater
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume23
    journal issue12
    journal titleJournal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology
    identifier doi10.1175/JTECH1946.1
    journal fristpage1709
    journal lastpage1728
    treeJournal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology:;2006:;volume( 023 ):;issue: 012
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian