YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Monitoring the Reflectivity Calibration of a Scanning Radar Using a Profiling Radar and a Disdrometer

    Source: Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology:;2005:;volume( 022 ):;issue: 007::page 1004
    Author:
    Williams, Christopher R.
    ,
    Gage, Kenneth S.
    ,
    Clark, Wallace
    ,
    Kucera, Paul
    DOI: 10.1175/JTECH1759.1
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: This paper describes a method of absolutely calibrating and routinely monitoring the reflectivity calibration from a scanning weather radar using a vertically profiling radar that has been absolutely calibrated using a collocated surface disdrometer. The three instruments have different temporal and spatial resolutions, and the concept of upscaling is used to relate the small resolution volume disdrometer observations with the large resolution volume scanning radar observations. This study uses observations collected from a surface disdrometer, two profiling radars, and the National Weather Service (NWS) Weather Surveillance Radar-1988 Doppler (WSR-88D) scanning weather radar during the Texas?Florida Underflight-phase B (TEFLUN-B) ground validation field campaign held in central Florida during August and September 1998. The statistics from the 2062 matched profiling and scanning radar observations during this 2-month period indicate that the WSR-88D radar had a reflectivity 0.7 dBZ higher than the disdrometer-calibrated profiler, the standard deviation was 2.4 dBZ, and the 95% confidence interval was 0.1 dBZ. This study implies that although there is large variability between individual matched observations, the precision of a series of observations is good, allowing meaningful comparisons useful for calibration and monitoring.
    • Download: (802.7Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Monitoring the Reflectivity Calibration of a Scanning Radar Using a Profiling Radar and a Disdrometer

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4227447
    Collections
    • Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology

    Show full item record

    contributor authorWilliams, Christopher R.
    contributor authorGage, Kenneth S.
    contributor authorClark, Wallace
    contributor authorKucera, Paul
    date accessioned2017-06-09T17:22:50Z
    date available2017-06-09T17:22:50Z
    date copyright2005/07/01
    date issued2005
    identifier issn0739-0572
    identifier otherams-84143.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4227447
    description abstractThis paper describes a method of absolutely calibrating and routinely monitoring the reflectivity calibration from a scanning weather radar using a vertically profiling radar that has been absolutely calibrated using a collocated surface disdrometer. The three instruments have different temporal and spatial resolutions, and the concept of upscaling is used to relate the small resolution volume disdrometer observations with the large resolution volume scanning radar observations. This study uses observations collected from a surface disdrometer, two profiling radars, and the National Weather Service (NWS) Weather Surveillance Radar-1988 Doppler (WSR-88D) scanning weather radar during the Texas?Florida Underflight-phase B (TEFLUN-B) ground validation field campaign held in central Florida during August and September 1998. The statistics from the 2062 matched profiling and scanning radar observations during this 2-month period indicate that the WSR-88D radar had a reflectivity 0.7 dBZ higher than the disdrometer-calibrated profiler, the standard deviation was 2.4 dBZ, and the 95% confidence interval was 0.1 dBZ. This study implies that although there is large variability between individual matched observations, the precision of a series of observations is good, allowing meaningful comparisons useful for calibration and monitoring.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleMonitoring the Reflectivity Calibration of a Scanning Radar Using a Profiling Radar and a Disdrometer
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume22
    journal issue7
    journal titleJournal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology
    identifier doi10.1175/JTECH1759.1
    journal fristpage1004
    journal lastpage1018
    treeJournal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology:;2005:;volume( 022 ):;issue: 007
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian