Error Characteristics of Rainfall Measurements by Collocated Joss–Waldvogel DisdrometersSource: Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology:;2005:;volume( 022 ):;issue: 005::page 513DOI: 10.1175/JTECH1734.1Publisher: American Meteorological Society
Abstract: Error characteristics of rainfall measurements were studied using six collocated Joss?Waldvogel (JW) disdrometers that are located at NASA?s Wallops Flight Facility. The six disdrometer means of rain rate R, reflectivity Z, and differential reflectivity ZDR, for a given minute were considered as a reference. The maximum deviations of R, Z, and ZDR from the mean in a rain event were 0.6 mm h?1, 1.3 dB, and 0.05 dB, respectively. Rainfall statistics were then examined between disdrometer pairs. The root-mean-square (rms) difference of R, Z, and ZDR between paired disdrometers in a rain event were as high as 3.2 mm h?1, 3.7 dB, and 0.3 dB, respectively. The rms difference of R and ZDR were even higher when the disdrometer observations were stratified based on reflectivity intervals. The differences in disdrometer rainfall measurements have a potential impact when the disdrometers are considered as calibration tools for vertically pointing and scanning radars. The differences between the disdrometer measurements also result in differences in coefficients and exponents of the derived relations between radar parameters and rain rate. Among the four different relations between radar parameters and rain rate, the absolute difference in rain rate |?R| from two different JW disdrometers was highest in R(ZH, ZDR) and lowest in R(KDP, ZDR). The other two relations were R(Z) and R(KDP). The |?R| increases with increasing horizontally polarized reflectivity ZH, and differential specific phase KDP in both single- and dual-parameter rainfall estimators, while the |?R| increases with decreasing ZDR in dual-parameter rainfall estimators. Several sources of JW disdrometer malfunctions were also presented. The hardware problems were the leading cause for the malfunction of the JW disdrometers, as identified by the manufacturer. A single JW disdrometer could have inherent measurement errors that can only be identified in the presence of collocated (preferably two) rain-measuring instruments.
|
Collections
Show full item record
contributor author | Tokay, Ali | |
contributor author | Bashor, Paul G. | |
contributor author | Wolff, Katherine R. | |
date accessioned | 2017-06-09T17:22:46Z | |
date available | 2017-06-09T17:22:46Z | |
date copyright | 2005/05/01 | |
date issued | 2005 | |
identifier issn | 0739-0572 | |
identifier other | ams-84118.pdf | |
identifier uri | http://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4227419 | |
description abstract | Error characteristics of rainfall measurements were studied using six collocated Joss?Waldvogel (JW) disdrometers that are located at NASA?s Wallops Flight Facility. The six disdrometer means of rain rate R, reflectivity Z, and differential reflectivity ZDR, for a given minute were considered as a reference. The maximum deviations of R, Z, and ZDR from the mean in a rain event were 0.6 mm h?1, 1.3 dB, and 0.05 dB, respectively. Rainfall statistics were then examined between disdrometer pairs. The root-mean-square (rms) difference of R, Z, and ZDR between paired disdrometers in a rain event were as high as 3.2 mm h?1, 3.7 dB, and 0.3 dB, respectively. The rms difference of R and ZDR were even higher when the disdrometer observations were stratified based on reflectivity intervals. The differences in disdrometer rainfall measurements have a potential impact when the disdrometers are considered as calibration tools for vertically pointing and scanning radars. The differences between the disdrometer measurements also result in differences in coefficients and exponents of the derived relations between radar parameters and rain rate. Among the four different relations between radar parameters and rain rate, the absolute difference in rain rate |?R| from two different JW disdrometers was highest in R(ZH, ZDR) and lowest in R(KDP, ZDR). The other two relations were R(Z) and R(KDP). The |?R| increases with increasing horizontally polarized reflectivity ZH, and differential specific phase KDP in both single- and dual-parameter rainfall estimators, while the |?R| increases with decreasing ZDR in dual-parameter rainfall estimators. Several sources of JW disdrometer malfunctions were also presented. The hardware problems were the leading cause for the malfunction of the JW disdrometers, as identified by the manufacturer. A single JW disdrometer could have inherent measurement errors that can only be identified in the presence of collocated (preferably two) rain-measuring instruments. | |
publisher | American Meteorological Society | |
title | Error Characteristics of Rainfall Measurements by Collocated Joss–Waldvogel Disdrometers | |
type | Journal Paper | |
journal volume | 22 | |
journal issue | 5 | |
journal title | Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology | |
identifier doi | 10.1175/JTECH1734.1 | |
journal fristpage | 513 | |
journal lastpage | 527 | |
tree | Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology:;2005:;volume( 022 ):;issue: 005 | |
contenttype | Fulltext |