YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Hydrometeorology
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Hydrometeorology
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    MRMS QPE Performance East of the Rockies during the 2014 Warm Season

    Source: Journal of Hydrometeorology:;2017:;Volume( 018 ):;issue: 003::page 761
    Author:
    Cocks, Stephen B.
    ,
    Zhang, Jian
    ,
    Martinaitis, Steven M.
    ,
    Qi, Youcun
    ,
    Kaney, Brian
    ,
    Howard, Kenneth
    DOI: 10.1175/JHM-D-16-0179.1
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: ulti-Radar Multi-Sensor (MRMS) quantitative precipitation estimation (QPE) radar only (Q3RAD), Q3RAD local gauge corrected (Q3gc), dual polarization (Dual Pol), legacy Precipitation Processing System (PPS), and National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) stage IV product performance were evaluated for data collected east of the Rockies during the 2014 warm season. For over 22 000 radar QPE?gauge data pairs, Q3RAD had a higher correlation coefficient (0.85) and a lower mean absolute error (9.4 mm) than the Dual Pol (0.83 and 10.5 mm, respectively) and PPS (0.79 and 10.8 mm, respectively). Q3RAD performed best when the radar beam sampled precipitation within or above the melting layer because of its use of a reflectivity mosaic corrected for brightband contamination. Both NCEP stage IV and Q3gc showed improvement over the radar-only QPEs; while stage IV exhibited the lower errors, the performance of Q3gc was remarkable considering the estimates were automatically generated in near?real time. Regional analysis indicated Q3RAD outperformed Dual Pol and PPS over the southern plains, Southeast/mid-Atlantic, and Northeast. Over the northern United States, Q3RAD had a higher wet bias below the melting layer than both Dual Pol and PPS; within and above the melting layer, Q3RAD exhibited the lowest errors. The Q3RAD wet bias was likely due to MRMS?s overestimation of tropical rain areas in continental regions and applying a high yield reflectivity?rain-rate relationship. An adjustment based on precipitation climatology reduced the wet bias errors by ~22% and will be implemented in the operational MRMS in the fall of 2016.
    • Download: (3.195Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      MRMS QPE Performance East of the Rockies during the 2014 Warm Season

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4225581
    Collections
    • Journal of Hydrometeorology

    Show full item record

    contributor authorCocks, Stephen B.
    contributor authorZhang, Jian
    contributor authorMartinaitis, Steven M.
    contributor authorQi, Youcun
    contributor authorKaney, Brian
    contributor authorHoward, Kenneth
    date accessioned2017-06-09T17:17:20Z
    date available2017-06-09T17:17:20Z
    date copyright2017/03/01
    date issued2017
    identifier issn1525-755X
    identifier otherams-82464.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4225581
    description abstractulti-Radar Multi-Sensor (MRMS) quantitative precipitation estimation (QPE) radar only (Q3RAD), Q3RAD local gauge corrected (Q3gc), dual polarization (Dual Pol), legacy Precipitation Processing System (PPS), and National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) stage IV product performance were evaluated for data collected east of the Rockies during the 2014 warm season. For over 22 000 radar QPE?gauge data pairs, Q3RAD had a higher correlation coefficient (0.85) and a lower mean absolute error (9.4 mm) than the Dual Pol (0.83 and 10.5 mm, respectively) and PPS (0.79 and 10.8 mm, respectively). Q3RAD performed best when the radar beam sampled precipitation within or above the melting layer because of its use of a reflectivity mosaic corrected for brightband contamination. Both NCEP stage IV and Q3gc showed improvement over the radar-only QPEs; while stage IV exhibited the lower errors, the performance of Q3gc was remarkable considering the estimates were automatically generated in near?real time. Regional analysis indicated Q3RAD outperformed Dual Pol and PPS over the southern plains, Southeast/mid-Atlantic, and Northeast. Over the northern United States, Q3RAD had a higher wet bias below the melting layer than both Dual Pol and PPS; within and above the melting layer, Q3RAD exhibited the lowest errors. The Q3RAD wet bias was likely due to MRMS?s overestimation of tropical rain areas in continental regions and applying a high yield reflectivity?rain-rate relationship. An adjustment based on precipitation climatology reduced the wet bias errors by ~22% and will be implemented in the operational MRMS in the fall of 2016.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleMRMS QPE Performance East of the Rockies during the 2014 Warm Season
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume18
    journal issue3
    journal titleJournal of Hydrometeorology
    identifier doi10.1175/JHM-D-16-0179.1
    journal fristpage761
    journal lastpage775
    treeJournal of Hydrometeorology:;2017:;Volume( 018 ):;issue: 003
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian