YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Hydrometeorology
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Hydrometeorology
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Vineyard energy partitioning between canopy and soil surface: dynamics and biophysical controls

    Source: Journal of Hydrometeorology:;2017:;Volume( 018 ):;issue: 007::page 1809
    Author:
    Zhao, Peng
    ,
    Zhang, Xiaotao
    ,
    Li, Sien
    ,
    Kang, Shaozhong
    DOI: 10.1175/JHM-D-16-0122.1
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: or sparse planting crops, soil surface plays an important role in energy balances processes within the soil-canopy-atmosphere continuum, thus it?s necessary to partition field energy fluxes into soil surface and canopy, to provide useful information to reduce agricultural water use and develop evapotranspiration models. Field experiments were conducted in vineyard during four growing seasons, to examine the energy partitioning among soil surface, canopy and field separately. Vineyard energy fluxes including latent heat ( LE ) were measured by eddy covariance system, and canopy latent heat (LEc) was obtained from sap flow, then latent heat from soil surface (LEs) was calculated as the differences between LE and LEc. Bowen ratio and the ratio of latent heat to available energy were used to examine energy partitioning. Results indicate daily and hourly LEs obtained from LE and LEc overestimated microlysimeters derived values by 13.0 and 10.8% respectively. Seasonal average latent heat accounted for 59.0-64.3, 65.8-77.8 and 56.6-62.5% of corresponding available energy for vineyard, canopy and soil surface, respectively. Soil water content and canopy were the main controlling factors on energy partitioning. Surface soil moisture explained 32, 11 and 52% of the seasonal variability in energy partitioning at field, canopy and soil surface, respectively. LAI explained 41 and 26% of the seasonal variability in energy partitioning at field and soil surface. Air temperature was related to canopy and field energy partitioning. During wet periods, soil can absorb sensible heat from canopy and LEs may exceed soil surface available energy. While during dry periods, canopy may absorb sensible heat from soil and LEc may exceed canopy available energy.
    • Download: (2.580Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Vineyard energy partitioning between canopy and soil surface: dynamics and biophysical controls

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4225544
    Collections
    • Journal of Hydrometeorology

    Show full item record

    contributor authorZhao, Peng
    contributor authorZhang, Xiaotao
    contributor authorLi, Sien
    contributor authorKang, Shaozhong
    date accessioned2017-06-09T17:17:15Z
    date available2017-06-09T17:17:15Z
    date issued2017
    identifier issn1525-755X
    identifier otherams-82431.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4225544
    description abstractor sparse planting crops, soil surface plays an important role in energy balances processes within the soil-canopy-atmosphere continuum, thus it?s necessary to partition field energy fluxes into soil surface and canopy, to provide useful information to reduce agricultural water use and develop evapotranspiration models. Field experiments were conducted in vineyard during four growing seasons, to examine the energy partitioning among soil surface, canopy and field separately. Vineyard energy fluxes including latent heat ( LE ) were measured by eddy covariance system, and canopy latent heat (LEc) was obtained from sap flow, then latent heat from soil surface (LEs) was calculated as the differences between LE and LEc. Bowen ratio and the ratio of latent heat to available energy were used to examine energy partitioning. Results indicate daily and hourly LEs obtained from LE and LEc overestimated microlysimeters derived values by 13.0 and 10.8% respectively. Seasonal average latent heat accounted for 59.0-64.3, 65.8-77.8 and 56.6-62.5% of corresponding available energy for vineyard, canopy and soil surface, respectively. Soil water content and canopy were the main controlling factors on energy partitioning. Surface soil moisture explained 32, 11 and 52% of the seasonal variability in energy partitioning at field, canopy and soil surface, respectively. LAI explained 41 and 26% of the seasonal variability in energy partitioning at field and soil surface. Air temperature was related to canopy and field energy partitioning. During wet periods, soil can absorb sensible heat from canopy and LEs may exceed soil surface available energy. While during dry periods, canopy may absorb sensible heat from soil and LEc may exceed canopy available energy.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleVineyard energy partitioning between canopy and soil surface: dynamics and biophysical controls
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume018
    journal issue007
    journal titleJournal of Hydrometeorology
    identifier doi10.1175/JHM-D-16-0122.1
    journal fristpage1809
    journal lastpage1829
    treeJournal of Hydrometeorology:;2017:;Volume( 018 ):;issue: 007
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian