Soil Apparent Thermal Diffusivity Estimated by Conduction and by Conduction–Convection Heat Transfer ModelsSource: Journal of Hydrometeorology:;2016:;Volume( 018 ):;issue: 001::page 109DOI: 10.1175/JHM-D-16-0086.1Publisher: American Meteorological Society
Abstract: oil heat transfer is complex, and conduction-alone models may not always perform well in estimating soil apparent thermal diffusivity. Soil apparent thermal diffusivity is related to soil temperature change propagation rates. Soil temperature data collected at the Tazhong station in China were used to examine the characteristics of soil apparent thermal diffusivity determined by three different algorithms and the sum of vertical gradient of soil apparent thermal diffusivity and apparent water flux density . The results showed that 1) soil apparent thermal diffusivity obtained with a conduction?convection algorithm had a better agreement with soil apparent thermal diffusivity obtained with a phase algorithm than with soil apparent thermal diffusivity obtained with an amplitude algorithm except for the case of = 0; 2) when > 0, , and when < 0, ; 3) for a given soil temperature phase shift, increased (decreased) with increasing logarithmic amplitude attenuation when the phase shift was larger (smaller) than the logarithmic amplitude attenuation, reached a maximum value when the phase shift equaled the logarithmic amplitude attenuation, and increased with increasing logarithmic amplitude attenuation; and 4) for a given logarithmic amplitude attenuation, decreased with increasing phase shift and increased (decreased) with increasing phase shift when the phase shift was larger (smaller) than times the logarithmic amplitude attenuation. These mathematical conclusions were also confirmed with field data.
|
Collections
Show full item record
contributor author | Tong, Bing | |
contributor author | Gao, Zhiqiu | |
contributor author | Horton, Robert | |
contributor author | Wang, Linlin | |
date accessioned | 2017-06-09T17:17:12Z | |
date available | 2017-06-09T17:17:12Z | |
date copyright | 2017/01/01 | |
date issued | 2016 | |
identifier issn | 1525-755X | |
identifier other | ams-82415.pdf | |
identifier uri | http://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4225527 | |
description abstract | oil heat transfer is complex, and conduction-alone models may not always perform well in estimating soil apparent thermal diffusivity. Soil apparent thermal diffusivity is related to soil temperature change propagation rates. Soil temperature data collected at the Tazhong station in China were used to examine the characteristics of soil apparent thermal diffusivity determined by three different algorithms and the sum of vertical gradient of soil apparent thermal diffusivity and apparent water flux density . The results showed that 1) soil apparent thermal diffusivity obtained with a conduction?convection algorithm had a better agreement with soil apparent thermal diffusivity obtained with a phase algorithm than with soil apparent thermal diffusivity obtained with an amplitude algorithm except for the case of = 0; 2) when > 0, , and when < 0, ; 3) for a given soil temperature phase shift, increased (decreased) with increasing logarithmic amplitude attenuation when the phase shift was larger (smaller) than the logarithmic amplitude attenuation, reached a maximum value when the phase shift equaled the logarithmic amplitude attenuation, and increased with increasing logarithmic amplitude attenuation; and 4) for a given logarithmic amplitude attenuation, decreased with increasing phase shift and increased (decreased) with increasing phase shift when the phase shift was larger (smaller) than times the logarithmic amplitude attenuation. These mathematical conclusions were also confirmed with field data. | |
publisher | American Meteorological Society | |
title | Soil Apparent Thermal Diffusivity Estimated by Conduction and by Conduction–Convection Heat Transfer Models | |
type | Journal Paper | |
journal volume | 18 | |
journal issue | 1 | |
journal title | Journal of Hydrometeorology | |
identifier doi | 10.1175/JHM-D-16-0086.1 | |
journal fristpage | 109 | |
journal lastpage | 118 | |
tree | Journal of Hydrometeorology:;2016:;Volume( 018 ):;issue: 001 | |
contenttype | Fulltext |