YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Hydrometeorology
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Hydrometeorology
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    MRMS QPE Performance during the 2013/14 Cool Season

    Source: Journal of Hydrometeorology:;2015:;Volume( 017 ):;issue: 003::page 791
    Author:
    Cocks, Stephen B.
    ,
    Martinaitis, Steven M.
    ,
    Kaney, Brian
    ,
    Zhang, Jian
    ,
    Howard, Kenneth
    DOI: 10.1175/JHM-D-15-0095.1
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: recently implemented operational quantitative precipitation estimation (QPE) product, the Multi-Radar Multi-Sensor (MRMS) radar-only QPE (Q3RAD), mosaicked dual-polarization QPE, and National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) stage II QPE were evaluated for nine cool season precipitation events east of the Rockies. These automated, radar-only products were compared with the forecaster quality-controlled NCEP stage IV product, which was considered as the benchmark for QPE. Community Collaborative Rain, Hail and Snow Network (CoCoRaHS) 24-h accumulation data were used to evaluate product performance while hourly automated gauge data (quality controlled) were used for spatial and time series analysis. Statistical analysis indicated all three radar-only products had a distinct underestimate bias, likely due to the radar beam partially or completely overshooting the predominantly shallow winter precipitation systems. While the forecaster quality-controlled NCEP stage IV estimates had the best overall performance, Q3RAD had the next best performance, which was significant as Q3RAD is available in real time whereas NCEP stage IV estimates are not. Stage II estimates exhibited a distinct tendency to underestimate gauge totals while dual-polarization estimates exhibited significant errors related to melting layer challenges.
    • Download: (5.707Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      MRMS QPE Performance during the 2013/14 Cool Season

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4225383
    Collections
    • Journal of Hydrometeorology

    Show full item record

    contributor authorCocks, Stephen B.
    contributor authorMartinaitis, Steven M.
    contributor authorKaney, Brian
    contributor authorZhang, Jian
    contributor authorHoward, Kenneth
    date accessioned2017-06-09T17:16:41Z
    date available2017-06-09T17:16:41Z
    date copyright2016/03/01
    date issued2015
    identifier issn1525-755X
    identifier otherams-82286.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4225383
    description abstractrecently implemented operational quantitative precipitation estimation (QPE) product, the Multi-Radar Multi-Sensor (MRMS) radar-only QPE (Q3RAD), mosaicked dual-polarization QPE, and National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) stage II QPE were evaluated for nine cool season precipitation events east of the Rockies. These automated, radar-only products were compared with the forecaster quality-controlled NCEP stage IV product, which was considered as the benchmark for QPE. Community Collaborative Rain, Hail and Snow Network (CoCoRaHS) 24-h accumulation data were used to evaluate product performance while hourly automated gauge data (quality controlled) were used for spatial and time series analysis. Statistical analysis indicated all three radar-only products had a distinct underestimate bias, likely due to the radar beam partially or completely overshooting the predominantly shallow winter precipitation systems. While the forecaster quality-controlled NCEP stage IV estimates had the best overall performance, Q3RAD had the next best performance, which was significant as Q3RAD is available in real time whereas NCEP stage IV estimates are not. Stage II estimates exhibited a distinct tendency to underestimate gauge totals while dual-polarization estimates exhibited significant errors related to melting layer challenges.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleMRMS QPE Performance during the 2013/14 Cool Season
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume17
    journal issue3
    journal titleJournal of Hydrometeorology
    identifier doi10.1175/JHM-D-15-0095.1
    journal fristpage791
    journal lastpage810
    treeJournal of Hydrometeorology:;2015:;Volume( 017 ):;issue: 003
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian