YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Hydrometeorology
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Hydrometeorology
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Use of Four Reanalysis Datasets to Assess the Terrestrial Branch of the Water Cycle over Quebec, Canada

    Source: Journal of Hydrometeorology:;2016:;Volume( 017 ):;issue: 005::page 1447
    Author:
    Sabarly, Florent
    ,
    Essou, Gilles
    ,
    Lucas-Picher, Philippe
    ,
    Poulin, Annie
    ,
    Brissette, François
    DOI: 10.1175/JHM-D-15-0093.1
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: eanalyses have the potential to provide meteorological information in areas where few or no traditional observation records are available. The terrestrial branch of the water cycle of CFSR, MERRA, ERA-Interim, and NARR is examined over Quebec, Canada, for the 1979?2008 time period. Precipitation, evaporation, runoff, and water balance are studied using observed precipitation and streamflows, according to three spatial scales: 1) the entire province of Quebec, 2) five regions derived from a climate classification, and 3) 11 river basins. The results reveal that MERRA provides a relatively closed water balance, while a significant residual was found for the other three reanalyses. MERRA and ERA-Interim seem to provide the most reliable precipitation over the province. On the other hand, precipitation from CFSR and NARR do not appear to be particularly reliable, especially over southern Quebec, as they almost systematically showed the highest and the lowest values, respectively. Moreover, the partitioning of precipitation into evaporation and runoff from MERRA and NARR does not agree with what was expected, particularly over southern, central, and eastern Quebec. Despite the weaknesses identified, the ability of reanalyses to reproduce the terrestrial water cycle of the recent past (i.e., 1979?2008) remains globally satisfactory. Nonetheless, their potential to provide reliable information must be validated by comparing reanalyses directly with weather stations, especially in remote areas.
    • Download: (4.448Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Use of Four Reanalysis Datasets to Assess the Terrestrial Branch of the Water Cycle over Quebec, Canada

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4225381
    Collections
    • Journal of Hydrometeorology

    Show full item record

    contributor authorSabarly, Florent
    contributor authorEssou, Gilles
    contributor authorLucas-Picher, Philippe
    contributor authorPoulin, Annie
    contributor authorBrissette, François
    date accessioned2017-06-09T17:16:40Z
    date available2017-06-09T17:16:40Z
    date copyright2016/05/01
    date issued2016
    identifier issn1525-755X
    identifier otherams-82284.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4225381
    description abstracteanalyses have the potential to provide meteorological information in areas where few or no traditional observation records are available. The terrestrial branch of the water cycle of CFSR, MERRA, ERA-Interim, and NARR is examined over Quebec, Canada, for the 1979?2008 time period. Precipitation, evaporation, runoff, and water balance are studied using observed precipitation and streamflows, according to three spatial scales: 1) the entire province of Quebec, 2) five regions derived from a climate classification, and 3) 11 river basins. The results reveal that MERRA provides a relatively closed water balance, while a significant residual was found for the other three reanalyses. MERRA and ERA-Interim seem to provide the most reliable precipitation over the province. On the other hand, precipitation from CFSR and NARR do not appear to be particularly reliable, especially over southern Quebec, as they almost systematically showed the highest and the lowest values, respectively. Moreover, the partitioning of precipitation into evaporation and runoff from MERRA and NARR does not agree with what was expected, particularly over southern, central, and eastern Quebec. Despite the weaknesses identified, the ability of reanalyses to reproduce the terrestrial water cycle of the recent past (i.e., 1979?2008) remains globally satisfactory. Nonetheless, their potential to provide reliable information must be validated by comparing reanalyses directly with weather stations, especially in remote areas.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleUse of Four Reanalysis Datasets to Assess the Terrestrial Branch of the Water Cycle over Quebec, Canada
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume17
    journal issue5
    journal titleJournal of Hydrometeorology
    identifier doi10.1175/JHM-D-15-0093.1
    journal fristpage1447
    journal lastpage1466
    treeJournal of Hydrometeorology:;2016:;Volume( 017 ):;issue: 005
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian