YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Hydrometeorology
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Hydrometeorology
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Effects of Land Surface Schemes on WRF-Simulated Geopotential Heights over China in Summer 2003

    Source: Journal of Hydrometeorology:;2015:;Volume( 017 ):;issue: 003::page 829
    Author:
    Zeng, Xin-Min
    ,
    Wang, B.
    ,
    Zhang, Y.
    ,
    Zheng, Y.
    ,
    Wang, N.
    ,
    Wang, M.
    ,
    Yi, X.
    ,
    Chen, C.
    ,
    Zhou, Z.
    ,
    Liu, H.
    DOI: 10.1175/JHM-D-14-0239.1
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: o quantify and explain effects of different land surface schemes (LSSs) on simulated geopotential height (GPH) fields, we performed simulations over China for the summer of 2003 using 12-member ensembles with the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) Model, version 3. The results show that while the model can generally simulate the seasonal and monthly mean GPH patterns, the effects of the LSS choice on simulated GPH fields are substantial, with the LSS-induced differences exceeding 10 gpm over a large area (especially the northwest) of China, which is very large compared with climate anomalies and forecast errors. In terms of the assessment measures for the four LSS ensembles [namely, the five-layer thermal diffusion scheme (SLAB), the Noah LSS (NOAH), the Rapid Update Cycle LSS (RUC), and the Pleim?Xiu LSS (PLEX)] in the WRF, the PLEX ensemble is the best, followed by the NOAH, RUC, and SLAB ensembles. The sensitivity of the simulated 850-hPa GPH is more significant than that of the 500-hPa GPH, with the 500-hPa GPH difference fields generally characterized by two large areas with opposite signs due to the smoothly varying nature of GPHs. LSS-induced GPH sensitivity is found to be higher than the GPH sensitivity induced by atmospheric boundary layer schemes. Moreover, theoretical analyses show that the LSS-induced GPH sensitivity is mainly caused by changes in surface fluxes (in particular, sensible heat flux), which further modify atmospheric temperature and pressure fields. The temperature and pressure fields generally have opposite contributions to changes in the GPH. This study emphasizes the importance of choosing and improving LSSs for simulating seasonal and monthly GPHs using regional climate models.
    • Download: (5.286Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Effects of Land Surface Schemes on WRF-Simulated Geopotential Heights over China in Summer 2003

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4225306
    Collections
    • Journal of Hydrometeorology

    Show full item record

    contributor authorZeng, Xin-Min
    contributor authorWang, B.
    contributor authorZhang, Y.
    contributor authorZheng, Y.
    contributor authorWang, N.
    contributor authorWang, M.
    contributor authorYi, X.
    contributor authorChen, C.
    contributor authorZhou, Z.
    contributor authorLiu, H.
    date accessioned2017-06-09T17:16:25Z
    date available2017-06-09T17:16:25Z
    date copyright2016/03/01
    date issued2015
    identifier issn1525-755X
    identifier otherams-82216.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4225306
    description abstracto quantify and explain effects of different land surface schemes (LSSs) on simulated geopotential height (GPH) fields, we performed simulations over China for the summer of 2003 using 12-member ensembles with the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) Model, version 3. The results show that while the model can generally simulate the seasonal and monthly mean GPH patterns, the effects of the LSS choice on simulated GPH fields are substantial, with the LSS-induced differences exceeding 10 gpm over a large area (especially the northwest) of China, which is very large compared with climate anomalies and forecast errors. In terms of the assessment measures for the four LSS ensembles [namely, the five-layer thermal diffusion scheme (SLAB), the Noah LSS (NOAH), the Rapid Update Cycle LSS (RUC), and the Pleim?Xiu LSS (PLEX)] in the WRF, the PLEX ensemble is the best, followed by the NOAH, RUC, and SLAB ensembles. The sensitivity of the simulated 850-hPa GPH is more significant than that of the 500-hPa GPH, with the 500-hPa GPH difference fields generally characterized by two large areas with opposite signs due to the smoothly varying nature of GPHs. LSS-induced GPH sensitivity is found to be higher than the GPH sensitivity induced by atmospheric boundary layer schemes. Moreover, theoretical analyses show that the LSS-induced GPH sensitivity is mainly caused by changes in surface fluxes (in particular, sensible heat flux), which further modify atmospheric temperature and pressure fields. The temperature and pressure fields generally have opposite contributions to changes in the GPH. This study emphasizes the importance of choosing and improving LSSs for simulating seasonal and monthly GPHs using regional climate models.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleEffects of Land Surface Schemes on WRF-Simulated Geopotential Heights over China in Summer 2003
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume17
    journal issue3
    journal titleJournal of Hydrometeorology
    identifier doi10.1175/JHM-D-14-0239.1
    journal fristpage829
    journal lastpage851
    treeJournal of Hydrometeorology:;2015:;Volume( 017 ):;issue: 003
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian