YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Hydrometeorology
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Hydrometeorology
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Improved Bias Correction Techniques for Hydrological Simulations of Climate Change

    Source: Journal of Hydrometeorology:;2015:;Volume( 016 ):;issue: 006::page 2421
    Author:
    Pierce, David W.
    ,
    Cayan, Daniel R.
    ,
    Maurer, Edwin P.
    ,
    Abatzoglou, John T.
    ,
    Hegewisch, Katherine C.
    DOI: 10.1175/JHM-D-14-0236.1
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: lobal climate model (GCM) output typically needs to be bias corrected before it can be used for climate change impact studies. Three existing bias correction methods, and a new one developed here, are applied to daily maximum temperature and precipitation from 21 GCMs to investigate how different methods alter the climate change signal of the GCM. The quantile mapping (QM) and cumulative distribution function transform (CDF-t) bias correction methods can significantly alter the GCM?s mean climate change signal, with differences of up to 2°C and 30% points for monthly mean temperature and precipitation, respectively. Equidistant quantile matching (EDCDFm) bias correction preserves GCM changes in mean daily maximum temperature but not precipitation. An extension to EDCDFm termed PresRat is introduced, which generally preserves the GCM changes in mean precipitation. Another problem is that GCMs can have difficulty simulating variance as a function of frequency. To address this, a frequency-dependent bias correction method is introduced that is twice as effective as standard bias correction in reducing errors in the models? simulation of variance as a function of frequency, and it does so without making any locations worse, unlike standard bias correction. Last, a preconditioning technique is introduced that improves the simulation of the annual cycle while still allowing the bias correction to take account of an entire season?s values at once.
    • Download: (7.957Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Improved Bias Correction Techniques for Hydrological Simulations of Climate Change

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4225303
    Collections
    • Journal of Hydrometeorology

    Show full item record

    contributor authorPierce, David W.
    contributor authorCayan, Daniel R.
    contributor authorMaurer, Edwin P.
    contributor authorAbatzoglou, John T.
    contributor authorHegewisch, Katherine C.
    date accessioned2017-06-09T17:16:24Z
    date available2017-06-09T17:16:24Z
    date copyright2015/12/01
    date issued2015
    identifier issn1525-755X
    identifier otherams-82213.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4225303
    description abstractlobal climate model (GCM) output typically needs to be bias corrected before it can be used for climate change impact studies. Three existing bias correction methods, and a new one developed here, are applied to daily maximum temperature and precipitation from 21 GCMs to investigate how different methods alter the climate change signal of the GCM. The quantile mapping (QM) and cumulative distribution function transform (CDF-t) bias correction methods can significantly alter the GCM?s mean climate change signal, with differences of up to 2°C and 30% points for monthly mean temperature and precipitation, respectively. Equidistant quantile matching (EDCDFm) bias correction preserves GCM changes in mean daily maximum temperature but not precipitation. An extension to EDCDFm termed PresRat is introduced, which generally preserves the GCM changes in mean precipitation. Another problem is that GCMs can have difficulty simulating variance as a function of frequency. To address this, a frequency-dependent bias correction method is introduced that is twice as effective as standard bias correction in reducing errors in the models? simulation of variance as a function of frequency, and it does so without making any locations worse, unlike standard bias correction. Last, a preconditioning technique is introduced that improves the simulation of the annual cycle while still allowing the bias correction to take account of an entire season?s values at once.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleImproved Bias Correction Techniques for Hydrological Simulations of Climate Change
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume16
    journal issue6
    journal titleJournal of Hydrometeorology
    identifier doi10.1175/JHM-D-14-0236.1
    journal fristpage2421
    journal lastpage2442
    treeJournal of Hydrometeorology:;2015:;Volume( 016 ):;issue: 006
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian