YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Hydrometeorology
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Hydrometeorology
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Soil Moisture Model Calibration and Validation: An ARS Watershed on the South Fork Iowa River

    Source: Journal of Hydrometeorology:;2015:;Volume( 016 ):;issue: 003::page 1087
    Author:
    Coopersmith, Evan J.
    ,
    Cosh, Michael H.
    ,
    Petersen, Walt A.
    ,
    Prueger, John
    ,
    Niemeier, James J.
    DOI: 10.1175/JHM-D-14-0145.1
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: oil moisture monitoring with in situ technology is a time-consuming and costly endeavor for which a method of increasing the resolution of spatial estimates across in situ networks is necessary. Using a simple hydrologic model, the estimation capacity of an in situ watershed network can be increased beyond the station distribution by using available precipitation, soil, and topographic information. A study site was selected on the Iowa River, characterized by homogeneous soil and topographic features, reducing the variables to precipitation only. Using 10-km precipitation estimates from the North American Land Data Assimilation System (NLDAS) for 2013, high-resolution estimates of surface soil moisture were generated in coordination with an in situ network, which was deployed as part of the Iowa Flood Studies (IFloodS). A simple, bucket model for soil moisture at each in situ sensor was calibrated using four precipitation products and subsequently validated at both the sensor for which it was calibrated and other proximal sensors, the latter after a bias correction step. Average RMSE values of 0.031 and 0.045 m3 m?3 were obtained for models validated at the sensor for which they were calibrated and at other nearby sensors, respectively.
    • Download: (1.347Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Soil Moisture Model Calibration and Validation: An ARS Watershed on the South Fork Iowa River

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4225228
    Collections
    • Journal of Hydrometeorology

    Show full item record

    contributor authorCoopersmith, Evan J.
    contributor authorCosh, Michael H.
    contributor authorPetersen, Walt A.
    contributor authorPrueger, John
    contributor authorNiemeier, James J.
    date accessioned2017-06-09T17:16:08Z
    date available2017-06-09T17:16:08Z
    date copyright2015/06/01
    date issued2015
    identifier issn1525-755X
    identifier otherams-82146.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4225228
    description abstractoil moisture monitoring with in situ technology is a time-consuming and costly endeavor for which a method of increasing the resolution of spatial estimates across in situ networks is necessary. Using a simple hydrologic model, the estimation capacity of an in situ watershed network can be increased beyond the station distribution by using available precipitation, soil, and topographic information. A study site was selected on the Iowa River, characterized by homogeneous soil and topographic features, reducing the variables to precipitation only. Using 10-km precipitation estimates from the North American Land Data Assimilation System (NLDAS) for 2013, high-resolution estimates of surface soil moisture were generated in coordination with an in situ network, which was deployed as part of the Iowa Flood Studies (IFloodS). A simple, bucket model for soil moisture at each in situ sensor was calibrated using four precipitation products and subsequently validated at both the sensor for which it was calibrated and other proximal sensors, the latter after a bias correction step. Average RMSE values of 0.031 and 0.045 m3 m?3 were obtained for models validated at the sensor for which they were calibrated and at other nearby sensors, respectively.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleSoil Moisture Model Calibration and Validation: An ARS Watershed on the South Fork Iowa River
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume16
    journal issue3
    journal titleJournal of Hydrometeorology
    identifier doi10.1175/JHM-D-14-0145.1
    journal fristpage1087
    journal lastpage1101
    treeJournal of Hydrometeorology:;2015:;Volume( 016 ):;issue: 003
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian