Uncertainties, Correlations, and Optimal Blends of Drought Indices from the NLDAS Multiple Land Surface Model EnsembleSource: Journal of Hydrometeorology:;2014:;Volume( 015 ):;issue: 004::page 1636Author:Xia, Youlong
,
Ek, Michael B.
,
Mocko, David
,
Peters-Lidard, Christa D.
,
Sheffield, Justin
,
Dong, Jiarui
,
Wood, Eric F.
DOI: 10.1175/JHM-D-13-058.1Publisher: American Meteorological Society
Abstract: his study analyzed uncertainties and correlations over the United States among four ensemble-mean North American Land Data Assimilation System (NLDAS) percentile-based drought indices derived from monthly mean evapotranspiration ET, total runoff Q, top 1-m soil moisture SM1, and total column soil moisture SMT. The results show that the uncertainty is smallest for SM1, largest for SMT, and moderate for ET and Q. The strongest correlation is between SM1 and SMT, and the weakest correlation is between ET and Q. The correlation between ET and SM1 (SMT) is strongest in arid?semiarid regions, and the correlation between Q and SM1 (SMT) is strongest in more humid regions in the Pacific Northwest and the Southeast. Drought frequency analysis shows that SM1 has the most frequent drought occurrence, followed by SMT, Q, and ET. The study compared the NLDAS drought indices (a research product) with the U.S. Drought Monitor (USDM; an operational product) in terms of drought area percentage derived from each product. It proposes an optimal blend of NLDAS drought indices by searching for weights for each index that minimizes the RMSE between NLDAS and USDM drought area percentage for a 10-yr period (2000?09) with a cross validation. It reconstructed a 30-yr (1980?2009) Objective Blended NLDAS Drought Index (OBNDI) and monthly drought percentage. Overall, the OBNDI performs the best with the smallest RMSE, followed by SM1 and SMT. It should be noted that the contribution to OBNDI from different variables varies with region. So a single formula is probably not the best representation of a blended index. The representation of a blended index using the multiple formulas will be addressed in a future study.
|
Collections
Show full item record
| contributor author | Xia, Youlong | |
| contributor author | Ek, Michael B. | |
| contributor author | Mocko, David | |
| contributor author | Peters-Lidard, Christa D. | |
| contributor author | Sheffield, Justin | |
| contributor author | Dong, Jiarui | |
| contributor author | Wood, Eric F. | |
| date accessioned | 2017-06-09T17:15:41Z | |
| date available | 2017-06-09T17:15:41Z | |
| date copyright | 2014/08/01 | |
| date issued | 2014 | |
| identifier issn | 1525-755X | |
| identifier other | ams-82016.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4225084 | |
| description abstract | his study analyzed uncertainties and correlations over the United States among four ensemble-mean North American Land Data Assimilation System (NLDAS) percentile-based drought indices derived from monthly mean evapotranspiration ET, total runoff Q, top 1-m soil moisture SM1, and total column soil moisture SMT. The results show that the uncertainty is smallest for SM1, largest for SMT, and moderate for ET and Q. The strongest correlation is between SM1 and SMT, and the weakest correlation is between ET and Q. The correlation between ET and SM1 (SMT) is strongest in arid?semiarid regions, and the correlation between Q and SM1 (SMT) is strongest in more humid regions in the Pacific Northwest and the Southeast. Drought frequency analysis shows that SM1 has the most frequent drought occurrence, followed by SMT, Q, and ET. The study compared the NLDAS drought indices (a research product) with the U.S. Drought Monitor (USDM; an operational product) in terms of drought area percentage derived from each product. It proposes an optimal blend of NLDAS drought indices by searching for weights for each index that minimizes the RMSE between NLDAS and USDM drought area percentage for a 10-yr period (2000?09) with a cross validation. It reconstructed a 30-yr (1980?2009) Objective Blended NLDAS Drought Index (OBNDI) and monthly drought percentage. Overall, the OBNDI performs the best with the smallest RMSE, followed by SM1 and SMT. It should be noted that the contribution to OBNDI from different variables varies with region. So a single formula is probably not the best representation of a blended index. The representation of a blended index using the multiple formulas will be addressed in a future study. | |
| publisher | American Meteorological Society | |
| title | Uncertainties, Correlations, and Optimal Blends of Drought Indices from the NLDAS Multiple Land Surface Model Ensemble | |
| type | Journal Paper | |
| journal volume | 15 | |
| journal issue | 4 | |
| journal title | Journal of Hydrometeorology | |
| identifier doi | 10.1175/JHM-D-13-058.1 | |
| journal fristpage | 1636 | |
| journal lastpage | 1650 | |
| tree | Journal of Hydrometeorology:;2014:;Volume( 015 ):;issue: 004 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext |