A Probabilistic View on Raindrop Size Distribution Modeling: A Physical Interpretation of Rain MicrophysicsSource: Journal of Hydrometeorology:;2013:;Volume( 015 ):;issue: 001::page 427DOI: 10.1175/JHM-D-13-033.1Publisher: American Meteorological Society
Abstract: he raindrop size distribution (RDSD) is defined as the relative frequency of raindrops per given diameter in a volume. This paper describes a mathematically consistent modeling of the RDSD drawing on probability theory. It is shown that this approach is simpler than the use of empirical fits and that it provides a more consistent procedure to estimate the rainfall rate (R) from reflectivity (Z) measurements without resorting to statistical regressions between both parameters. If the gamma distribution form is selected, the modeling expresses the integral parameters Z and R in terms of only the total number of drops per volume (NT), the sample mean [m = E(D)], and the sample variance [σ2 = E(m ? D)2] of the drop diameters (D) or, alternatively, in terms of NT, E(D), and E[log(D)]. Statistical analyses indicate that (NT, m) are independent, as are (NT, σ2). The Z?R relationship that arises from this model is a linear R = T ? Z expression (or Z = T?1R), with T a factor depending on m and σ2 only and thus independent of NT. The Z?R so described is instantaneous, in contrast with the operational calculation of the RDSD in radar meteorology, where the Z?R arises from a regression line over a usually large number of measurements. The probabilistic approach eliminates the need of intercept parameters N0 or , which are often used in statistical approaches but lack physical meaning. The modeling presented here preserves a well-defined and consistent set of units across all the equations, also taking into account the effects of RDSD truncation. It is also shown that the rain microphysical processes such as coalescence, breakup, or evaporation can then be easily described in terms of two parameters?the sample mean and the sample variance?and that each of those processes have a straightforward translation in changes of the instantaneous Z?R relationship.
|
Collections
Show full item record
contributor author | Tapiador, Francisco J. | |
contributor author | Haddad, Ziad S. | |
contributor author | Turk, Joe | |
date accessioned | 2017-06-09T17:15:36Z | |
date available | 2017-06-09T17:15:36Z | |
date copyright | 2014/02/01 | |
date issued | 2013 | |
identifier issn | 1525-755X | |
identifier other | ams-81996.pdf | |
identifier uri | http://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4225060 | |
description abstract | he raindrop size distribution (RDSD) is defined as the relative frequency of raindrops per given diameter in a volume. This paper describes a mathematically consistent modeling of the RDSD drawing on probability theory. It is shown that this approach is simpler than the use of empirical fits and that it provides a more consistent procedure to estimate the rainfall rate (R) from reflectivity (Z) measurements without resorting to statistical regressions between both parameters. If the gamma distribution form is selected, the modeling expresses the integral parameters Z and R in terms of only the total number of drops per volume (NT), the sample mean [m = E(D)], and the sample variance [σ2 = E(m ? D)2] of the drop diameters (D) or, alternatively, in terms of NT, E(D), and E[log(D)]. Statistical analyses indicate that (NT, m) are independent, as are (NT, σ2). The Z?R relationship that arises from this model is a linear R = T ? Z expression (or Z = T?1R), with T a factor depending on m and σ2 only and thus independent of NT. The Z?R so described is instantaneous, in contrast with the operational calculation of the RDSD in radar meteorology, where the Z?R arises from a regression line over a usually large number of measurements. The probabilistic approach eliminates the need of intercept parameters N0 or , which are often used in statistical approaches but lack physical meaning. The modeling presented here preserves a well-defined and consistent set of units across all the equations, also taking into account the effects of RDSD truncation. It is also shown that the rain microphysical processes such as coalescence, breakup, or evaporation can then be easily described in terms of two parameters?the sample mean and the sample variance?and that each of those processes have a straightforward translation in changes of the instantaneous Z?R relationship. | |
publisher | American Meteorological Society | |
title | A Probabilistic View on Raindrop Size Distribution Modeling: A Physical Interpretation of Rain Microphysics | |
type | Journal Paper | |
journal volume | 15 | |
journal issue | 1 | |
journal title | Journal of Hydrometeorology | |
identifier doi | 10.1175/JHM-D-13-033.1 | |
journal fristpage | 427 | |
journal lastpage | 443 | |
tree | Journal of Hydrometeorology:;2013:;Volume( 015 ):;issue: 001 | |
contenttype | Fulltext |