YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Hydrometeorology
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Hydrometeorology
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Summer Land–Atmosphere Coupling Strength in the United States: Comparison among Observations, Reanalysis Data, and Numerical Models

    Source: Journal of Hydrometeorology:;2012:;Volume( 013 ):;issue: 003::page 1010
    Author:
    Mei, Rui
    ,
    Wang, Guiling
    DOI: 10.1175/JHM-D-11-075.1
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: his study examines the land?atmosphere coupling strength during summer over subregions of the United States based on observations [Climate Prediction Center (CPC)?Variable Infiltration Capacity (VIC)], reanalysis data [North American Regional Reanalysis (NARR) and NCEP Climate Forecast System Reanalysis (CFSR)], and models [Community Atmosphere Model, version 3 (CAM3)?Community Land Model, version 3 (CLM3) and CAM4?CLM4]. The probability density function of conditioned correlation between soil moisture and subsequent precipitation or surface temperature during the years of large precipitation anomalies is used as a measure for the coupling strength. There are three major findings: 1) among the eight subregions (classified by land cover types), the transition zone Great Plains (and, to a lesser extent, the Midwest and Southeast) are identified as hot spots for strong land?atmosphere coupling; 2) soil moisture?precipitation coupling is weaker than soil moisture?surface temperature coupling; and 3) the coupling strength is stronger in observational and reanalysis products than in the models examined, especially in CAM4?CLM4. The conditioned correlation analysis also indicates that the coupling strength in CAM4?CLM4 is weaker than in CAM3?CLM3, which is further supported by Global Land?Atmosphere Coupling Experiments1 (GLACE1)-type experiments and attributed to changes in CAM rather than modifications in CLM. Contrary to suggestions in previous studies, CAM?CLM models do not seem to overestimate the land?atmosphere coupling strength.
    • Download: (1.118Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Summer Land–Atmosphere Coupling Strength in the United States: Comparison among Observations, Reanalysis Data, and Numerical Models

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4224790
    Collections
    • Journal of Hydrometeorology

    Show full item record

    contributor authorMei, Rui
    contributor authorWang, Guiling
    date accessioned2017-06-09T17:14:44Z
    date available2017-06-09T17:14:44Z
    date copyright2012/06/01
    date issued2012
    identifier issn1525-755X
    identifier otherams-81752.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4224790
    description abstracthis study examines the land?atmosphere coupling strength during summer over subregions of the United States based on observations [Climate Prediction Center (CPC)?Variable Infiltration Capacity (VIC)], reanalysis data [North American Regional Reanalysis (NARR) and NCEP Climate Forecast System Reanalysis (CFSR)], and models [Community Atmosphere Model, version 3 (CAM3)?Community Land Model, version 3 (CLM3) and CAM4?CLM4]. The probability density function of conditioned correlation between soil moisture and subsequent precipitation or surface temperature during the years of large precipitation anomalies is used as a measure for the coupling strength. There are three major findings: 1) among the eight subregions (classified by land cover types), the transition zone Great Plains (and, to a lesser extent, the Midwest and Southeast) are identified as hot spots for strong land?atmosphere coupling; 2) soil moisture?precipitation coupling is weaker than soil moisture?surface temperature coupling; and 3) the coupling strength is stronger in observational and reanalysis products than in the models examined, especially in CAM4?CLM4. The conditioned correlation analysis also indicates that the coupling strength in CAM4?CLM4 is weaker than in CAM3?CLM3, which is further supported by Global Land?Atmosphere Coupling Experiments1 (GLACE1)-type experiments and attributed to changes in CAM rather than modifications in CLM. Contrary to suggestions in previous studies, CAM?CLM models do not seem to overestimate the land?atmosphere coupling strength.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleSummer Land–Atmosphere Coupling Strength in the United States: Comparison among Observations, Reanalysis Data, and Numerical Models
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume13
    journal issue3
    journal titleJournal of Hydrometeorology
    identifier doi10.1175/JHM-D-11-075.1
    journal fristpage1010
    journal lastpage1022
    treeJournal of Hydrometeorology:;2012:;Volume( 013 ):;issue: 003
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian