Estimating the Accuracy of Polarimetric Radar–Based Retrievals of Drop-Size Distribution Parameters and Rain Rate: An Application of Error Variance Separation Using Radar-Derived Spatial CorrelationsSource: Journal of Hydrometeorology:;2012:;Volume( 013 ):;issue: 003::page 1066DOI: 10.1175/JHM-D-11-070.1Publisher: American Meteorological Society
Abstract: he accuracy of retrieving the two drop size distribution (DSD) parameters, median volume diameter (D0), and normalized intercept parameter (NW), as well as rain rate (R), from polarimetric C-band radar data obtained during a cool-season, long-duration precipitation event in Huntsville, Alabama, is examined. The radar was operated in a special ?near-dwelling? mode over two video disdrometers (2DVD) located 15 km away. The polarimetric radar?based retrieval algorithms for the DSD parameters and rain rate were obtained from simulations using the 2DVD measurements of the DSD. A unique feature of this paper is the radar-based estimation of the spatial correlation functions of the two DSD parameters and rain rate that are used to estimate the ?point-to-area? variance. A detailed error variance separation is performed, including the aforementioned point-to-area variance, along with variance components due to the retrieval algorithm error, radar measurement error, and disdrometer sampling error. The spatial decorrelation distance was found to be smallest for the R (4.5 km) and largest for D0 (8.24 km). For log10(NW), it was 7.22 km. The proportion of the variance of the difference between radar-based estimates and 2DVD measurements that could be explained by the aforementioned errors was 100%, 57%, and 73% for D0, log10(NW), and R, respectively. The overall accuracy of the radar-based retrievals for the particular precipitation event quantified in terms of the fractional standard deviation were estimated to be 6.8%, 6%, and 21% for D0, log10(NW), and R, respectively. The normalized bias was <1%. These correspond to time resolution of ~3 min and spatial resolution of ~1.5 km.
|
Collections
Show full item record
contributor author | Thurai, M. | |
contributor author | Bringi, V. N. | |
contributor author | Carey, L. D. | |
contributor author | Gatlin, P. | |
contributor author | Schultz, E. | |
contributor author | Petersen, W. A. | |
date accessioned | 2017-06-09T17:14:44Z | |
date available | 2017-06-09T17:14:44Z | |
date copyright | 2012/06/01 | |
date issued | 2012 | |
identifier issn | 1525-755X | |
identifier other | ams-81748.pdf | |
identifier uri | http://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4224785 | |
description abstract | he accuracy of retrieving the two drop size distribution (DSD) parameters, median volume diameter (D0), and normalized intercept parameter (NW), as well as rain rate (R), from polarimetric C-band radar data obtained during a cool-season, long-duration precipitation event in Huntsville, Alabama, is examined. The radar was operated in a special ?near-dwelling? mode over two video disdrometers (2DVD) located 15 km away. The polarimetric radar?based retrieval algorithms for the DSD parameters and rain rate were obtained from simulations using the 2DVD measurements of the DSD. A unique feature of this paper is the radar-based estimation of the spatial correlation functions of the two DSD parameters and rain rate that are used to estimate the ?point-to-area? variance. A detailed error variance separation is performed, including the aforementioned point-to-area variance, along with variance components due to the retrieval algorithm error, radar measurement error, and disdrometer sampling error. The spatial decorrelation distance was found to be smallest for the R (4.5 km) and largest for D0 (8.24 km). For log10(NW), it was 7.22 km. The proportion of the variance of the difference between radar-based estimates and 2DVD measurements that could be explained by the aforementioned errors was 100%, 57%, and 73% for D0, log10(NW), and R, respectively. The overall accuracy of the radar-based retrievals for the particular precipitation event quantified in terms of the fractional standard deviation were estimated to be 6.8%, 6%, and 21% for D0, log10(NW), and R, respectively. The normalized bias was <1%. These correspond to time resolution of ~3 min and spatial resolution of ~1.5 km. | |
publisher | American Meteorological Society | |
title | Estimating the Accuracy of Polarimetric Radar–Based Retrievals of Drop-Size Distribution Parameters and Rain Rate: An Application of Error Variance Separation Using Radar-Derived Spatial Correlations | |
type | Journal Paper | |
journal volume | 13 | |
journal issue | 3 | |
journal title | Journal of Hydrometeorology | |
identifier doi | 10.1175/JHM-D-11-070.1 | |
journal fristpage | 1066 | |
journal lastpage | 1079 | |
tree | Journal of Hydrometeorology:;2012:;Volume( 013 ):;issue: 003 | |
contenttype | Fulltext |