YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Hydrometeorology
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Hydrometeorology
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Soil Moisture Analyses at ECMWF: Evaluation Using Global Ground-Based In Situ Observations

    Source: Journal of Hydrometeorology:;2012:;Volume( 013 ):;issue: 005::page 1442
    Author:
    Albergel, C.
    ,
    de Rosnay, P.
    ,
    Balsamo, G.
    ,
    Isaksen, L.
    ,
    Muñoz-Sabater, J.
    DOI: 10.1175/JHM-D-11-0107.1
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: n situ soil moisture from 117 stations across the world and under different biome and climate conditions are used to evaluate two soil moisture products from the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF)?namely, the operational analysis and the interim reanalysis [ECMWF Re-Analysis Interim (ERA-Interim)]. ECMWF?s operational Integrated Forecasting System (IFS) is based on a continuous effort to improve the analysis and modeling systems, resulting in frequent updates (a few times a year). The ERA-Interim reanalysis is produced by a fixed IFS version (for the main component of the atmospheric model and data assimilation). It has the advantage of being consistent over the whole period from 1979 onward and by design, reanalysis products are more suitable than their operational counterparts for use in climate studies. Although the two analyses show good skills in capturing surface soil moisture variability, they tend to overestimate soil moisture, particularly for dry land. Over the 2008?10 period, averaged statistical scores (correlation, bias, and root-mean-square difference) are 0.70, ?0.081 m3 m?3, and 0.113 m3 m?3 for the operational product and 0.63, ?0.079 m3 m?3, and 0.121 m3 m?3 for ERA-Interim. Compared to the scheme used in ERA-Interim, the current model used in the IFS has an improved match to soil moisture that is attributed to recent changes in the IFS. Indeed, major upgrades recently implemented in the operational land surface analysis and modeling system improve the surface and the root-zone soil moisture analyses.
    • Download: (2.376Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Soil Moisture Analyses at ECMWF: Evaluation Using Global Ground-Based In Situ Observations

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4224696
    Collections
    • Journal of Hydrometeorology

    Show full item record

    contributor authorAlbergel, C.
    contributor authorde Rosnay, P.
    contributor authorBalsamo, G.
    contributor authorIsaksen, L.
    contributor authorMuñoz-Sabater, J.
    date accessioned2017-06-09T17:14:25Z
    date available2017-06-09T17:14:25Z
    date copyright2012/10/01
    date issued2012
    identifier issn1525-755X
    identifier otherams-81668.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4224696
    description abstractn situ soil moisture from 117 stations across the world and under different biome and climate conditions are used to evaluate two soil moisture products from the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF)?namely, the operational analysis and the interim reanalysis [ECMWF Re-Analysis Interim (ERA-Interim)]. ECMWF?s operational Integrated Forecasting System (IFS) is based on a continuous effort to improve the analysis and modeling systems, resulting in frequent updates (a few times a year). The ERA-Interim reanalysis is produced by a fixed IFS version (for the main component of the atmospheric model and data assimilation). It has the advantage of being consistent over the whole period from 1979 onward and by design, reanalysis products are more suitable than their operational counterparts for use in climate studies. Although the two analyses show good skills in capturing surface soil moisture variability, they tend to overestimate soil moisture, particularly for dry land. Over the 2008?10 period, averaged statistical scores (correlation, bias, and root-mean-square difference) are 0.70, ?0.081 m3 m?3, and 0.113 m3 m?3 for the operational product and 0.63, ?0.079 m3 m?3, and 0.121 m3 m?3 for ERA-Interim. Compared to the scheme used in ERA-Interim, the current model used in the IFS has an improved match to soil moisture that is attributed to recent changes in the IFS. Indeed, major upgrades recently implemented in the operational land surface analysis and modeling system improve the surface and the root-zone soil moisture analyses.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleSoil Moisture Analyses at ECMWF: Evaluation Using Global Ground-Based In Situ Observations
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume13
    journal issue5
    journal titleJournal of Hydrometeorology
    identifier doi10.1175/JHM-D-11-0107.1
    journal fristpage1442
    journal lastpage1460
    treeJournal of Hydrometeorology:;2012:;Volume( 013 ):;issue: 005
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian