Influence of Land Cover and Soil Moisture on the Horizontal Distribution of Sensible and Latent Heat Fluxes in Southeast Kansas during IHOP_2002 and CASES-97Source: Journal of Hydrometeorology:;2007:;Volume( 008 ):;issue: 001::page 68Author:LeMone, Margaret A.
,
Chen, Fei
,
Alfieri, Joseph G.
,
Tewari, Mukul
,
Geerts, Bart
,
Miao, Qun
,
Grossman, Robert L.
,
Coulter, Richard L.
DOI: 10.1175/JHM554.1Publisher: American Meteorological Society
Abstract: Analyses of daytime fair-weather aircraft and surface-flux tower data from the May?June 2002 International H2O Project (IHOP_2002) and the April?May 1997 Cooperative Atmosphere Surface Exchange Study (CASES-97) are used to document the role of vegetation, soil moisture, and terrain in determining the horizontal variability of latent heat LE and sensible heat H along a 46-km flight track in southeast Kansas. Combining the two field experiments clearly reveals the strong influence of vegetation cover, with H maxima over sparse/dormant vegetation, and H minima over green vegetation; and, to a lesser extent, LE maxima over green vegetation, and LE minima over sparse/dormant vegetation. If the small number of cases is producing the correct trend, other effects of vegetation and the impact of soil moisture emerge through examining the slope ?xyLE/?xyH for the best-fit straight line for plots of time-averaged LE as a function of time-averaged H over the area. Based on the surface energy balance, H + LE = Rnet ? Gsfc, where Rnet is the net radiation and Gsfc is the flux into the soil; Rnet ? Gsfc ? constant over the area implies an approximately ?1 slope. Right after rainfall, H and LE vary too little horizontally to define a slope. After sufficient drying to produce enough horizontal variation to define a slope, a steep (??2) slope emerges. The slope becomes shallower and better defined with time as H and LE horizontal variability increases. Similarly, the slope becomes more negative with moister soils. In addition, the slope can change with time of day due to phase differences in H and LE. These trends are based on land surface model (LSM) runs and observations collected under nearly clear skies; the vegetation is unstressed for the days examined. LSM runs suggest terrain may also play a role, but observational support is weak.
|
Collections
Show full item record
contributor author | LeMone, Margaret A. | |
contributor author | Chen, Fei | |
contributor author | Alfieri, Joseph G. | |
contributor author | Tewari, Mukul | |
contributor author | Geerts, Bart | |
contributor author | Miao, Qun | |
contributor author | Grossman, Robert L. | |
contributor author | Coulter, Richard L. | |
date accessioned | 2017-06-09T17:14:07Z | |
date available | 2017-06-09T17:14:07Z | |
date copyright | 2007/02/01 | |
date issued | 2007 | |
identifier issn | 1525-755X | |
identifier other | ams-81560.pdf | |
identifier uri | http://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4224576 | |
description abstract | Analyses of daytime fair-weather aircraft and surface-flux tower data from the May?June 2002 International H2O Project (IHOP_2002) and the April?May 1997 Cooperative Atmosphere Surface Exchange Study (CASES-97) are used to document the role of vegetation, soil moisture, and terrain in determining the horizontal variability of latent heat LE and sensible heat H along a 46-km flight track in southeast Kansas. Combining the two field experiments clearly reveals the strong influence of vegetation cover, with H maxima over sparse/dormant vegetation, and H minima over green vegetation; and, to a lesser extent, LE maxima over green vegetation, and LE minima over sparse/dormant vegetation. If the small number of cases is producing the correct trend, other effects of vegetation and the impact of soil moisture emerge through examining the slope ?xyLE/?xyH for the best-fit straight line for plots of time-averaged LE as a function of time-averaged H over the area. Based on the surface energy balance, H + LE = Rnet ? Gsfc, where Rnet is the net radiation and Gsfc is the flux into the soil; Rnet ? Gsfc ? constant over the area implies an approximately ?1 slope. Right after rainfall, H and LE vary too little horizontally to define a slope. After sufficient drying to produce enough horizontal variation to define a slope, a steep (??2) slope emerges. The slope becomes shallower and better defined with time as H and LE horizontal variability increases. Similarly, the slope becomes more negative with moister soils. In addition, the slope can change with time of day due to phase differences in H and LE. These trends are based on land surface model (LSM) runs and observations collected under nearly clear skies; the vegetation is unstressed for the days examined. LSM runs suggest terrain may also play a role, but observational support is weak. | |
publisher | American Meteorological Society | |
title | Influence of Land Cover and Soil Moisture on the Horizontal Distribution of Sensible and Latent Heat Fluxes in Southeast Kansas during IHOP_2002 and CASES-97 | |
type | Journal Paper | |
journal volume | 8 | |
journal issue | 1 | |
journal title | Journal of Hydrometeorology | |
identifier doi | 10.1175/JHM554.1 | |
journal fristpage | 68 | |
journal lastpage | 87 | |
tree | Journal of Hydrometeorology:;2007:;Volume( 008 ):;issue: 001 | |
contenttype | Fulltext |