YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Hydrometeorology
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Hydrometeorology
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Estimating Large-Scale Precipitation Minus Evapotranspiration from GRACE Satellite Gravity Measurements

    Source: Journal of Hydrometeorology:;2006:;Volume( 007 ):;issue: 002::page 252
    Author:
    Swenson, Sean
    ,
    Wahr, John
    DOI: 10.1175/JHM478.1
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: Currently, observations of key components of the earth's large-scale water and energy budgets are sparse or even nonexistent. One key component, precipitation minus evapotranspiration (P ? ET), remains largely unmeasured due to the absence of observations of ET. Precipitation minus evapotranspiration describes the flux of water between the atmosphere and the earth's surface, and therefore provides important information regarding the interaction of the atmosphere with the land surface. In this paper, large-scale changes in continental water storage derived from satellite gravity data from the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) project are combined with river discharge data to obtain estimates of areally averaged P ? ET. After constructing an equation describing the large-scale terrestrial water balance reflecting the temporal sampling of GRACE water storage estimates, GRACE-derived P ? ET estimates are compared to those obtained from a reanalysis dataset [NCEP/Department of Energy (DOE) reanalysis-2] and a land surface model driven with observation-based forcing [Global Land Data Assimilation System (GLDAS)/Noah] for two large U.S. river basins. GRACE-derived P ? ET compares quite favorably with the reanalysis-2 output, while P ? ET from the Noah model shows significant differences. Because the uncertainties in the GRACE results can be computed rigorously, this comparison may be considered as a validation of the models. In addition to showing how GRACE P ? ET estimates may be used to validate model output, the accuracy of GRACE estimates of both the seasonal cycle and the monthly averaged rate of P ? ET is examined. Finally, the potential for estimating seasonal evapotranspiration is demonstrated by combining GRACE seasonal P ? ET estimates with independent estimates of the seasonal cycle of precipitation.
    • Download: (1.622Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Estimating Large-Scale Precipitation Minus Evapotranspiration from GRACE Satellite Gravity Measurements

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4224492
    Collections
    • Journal of Hydrometeorology

    Show full item record

    contributor authorSwenson, Sean
    contributor authorWahr, John
    date accessioned2017-06-09T17:13:53Z
    date available2017-06-09T17:13:53Z
    date copyright2006/04/01
    date issued2006
    identifier issn1525-755X
    identifier otherams-81484.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4224492
    description abstractCurrently, observations of key components of the earth's large-scale water and energy budgets are sparse or even nonexistent. One key component, precipitation minus evapotranspiration (P ? ET), remains largely unmeasured due to the absence of observations of ET. Precipitation minus evapotranspiration describes the flux of water between the atmosphere and the earth's surface, and therefore provides important information regarding the interaction of the atmosphere with the land surface. In this paper, large-scale changes in continental water storage derived from satellite gravity data from the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) project are combined with river discharge data to obtain estimates of areally averaged P ? ET. After constructing an equation describing the large-scale terrestrial water balance reflecting the temporal sampling of GRACE water storage estimates, GRACE-derived P ? ET estimates are compared to those obtained from a reanalysis dataset [NCEP/Department of Energy (DOE) reanalysis-2] and a land surface model driven with observation-based forcing [Global Land Data Assimilation System (GLDAS)/Noah] for two large U.S. river basins. GRACE-derived P ? ET compares quite favorably with the reanalysis-2 output, while P ? ET from the Noah model shows significant differences. Because the uncertainties in the GRACE results can be computed rigorously, this comparison may be considered as a validation of the models. In addition to showing how GRACE P ? ET estimates may be used to validate model output, the accuracy of GRACE estimates of both the seasonal cycle and the monthly averaged rate of P ? ET is examined. Finally, the potential for estimating seasonal evapotranspiration is demonstrated by combining GRACE seasonal P ? ET estimates with independent estimates of the seasonal cycle of precipitation.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleEstimating Large-Scale Precipitation Minus Evapotranspiration from GRACE Satellite Gravity Measurements
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume7
    journal issue2
    journal titleJournal of Hydrometeorology
    identifier doi10.1175/JHM478.1
    journal fristpage252
    journal lastpage270
    treeJournal of Hydrometeorology:;2006:;Volume( 007 ):;issue: 002
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian