YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Hydrometeorology
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Hydrometeorology
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Determining Meaningful Differences for SMACEX Eddy Covariance Measurements

    Source: Journal of Hydrometeorology:;2005:;Volume( 006 ):;issue: 006::page 805
    Author:
    Meek, D. W.
    ,
    Prueger, J. H.
    ,
    Kustas, W. P.
    ,
    Hatfield, J. L.
    DOI: 10.1175/JHM458.1
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: Two eddy covariance instrument comparison studies were conducted before and after the Soil Moisture?Atmosphere Coupling Experiment (SMACEX) field campaign to 1) determine if observations from multiple sensors were equivalent for the measured variables over a uniform surface and to 2) determine a least significant difference (LSD) value for each variable to discriminate between daily and hourly differences in latent and sensible heat and carbon dioxide fluxes, friction velocity, and standard deviation of the vertical wind velocity from eddy covariance instruments placed in different locations within the study area. The studies were conducted in early June over an alfalfa field and in mid-September over a short grass field. Several statistical exploratory, graphical, and multiple-comparison procedures were used to evaluate each daily variable. Daily total or average data were used to estimate a pooled standard error and corresponding LSD values at the P = 0.05 and P = 0.01 levels using univariate procedures. There were no significant sensor differences in any of the daily measurements for either intercomparison period. Hourly averaged data were used to estimate a pooled standard error and corresponding LSD values at the P = 0.05 and P = 0.01 levels using mixed model procedures. Sensor differences for pre- and post-intercomparisons were minimal for hourly and daily values of CO2, water vapor, sensible heat, friction velocity, and standard deviation for vertical wind velocity. Computed LSD values were used to determine significant daily differences and threshold values for the variables monitored during the SMACEX campaign.
    • Download: (422.2Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Determining Meaningful Differences for SMACEX Eddy Covariance Measurements

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4224471
    Collections
    • Journal of Hydrometeorology

    Show full item record

    contributor authorMeek, D. W.
    contributor authorPrueger, J. H.
    contributor authorKustas, W. P.
    contributor authorHatfield, J. L.
    date accessioned2017-06-09T17:13:50Z
    date available2017-06-09T17:13:50Z
    date copyright2005/12/01
    date issued2005
    identifier issn1525-755X
    identifier otherams-81465.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4224471
    description abstractTwo eddy covariance instrument comparison studies were conducted before and after the Soil Moisture?Atmosphere Coupling Experiment (SMACEX) field campaign to 1) determine if observations from multiple sensors were equivalent for the measured variables over a uniform surface and to 2) determine a least significant difference (LSD) value for each variable to discriminate between daily and hourly differences in latent and sensible heat and carbon dioxide fluxes, friction velocity, and standard deviation of the vertical wind velocity from eddy covariance instruments placed in different locations within the study area. The studies were conducted in early June over an alfalfa field and in mid-September over a short grass field. Several statistical exploratory, graphical, and multiple-comparison procedures were used to evaluate each daily variable. Daily total or average data were used to estimate a pooled standard error and corresponding LSD values at the P = 0.05 and P = 0.01 levels using univariate procedures. There were no significant sensor differences in any of the daily measurements for either intercomparison period. Hourly averaged data were used to estimate a pooled standard error and corresponding LSD values at the P = 0.05 and P = 0.01 levels using mixed model procedures. Sensor differences for pre- and post-intercomparisons were minimal for hourly and daily values of CO2, water vapor, sensible heat, friction velocity, and standard deviation for vertical wind velocity. Computed LSD values were used to determine significant daily differences and threshold values for the variables monitored during the SMACEX campaign.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleDetermining Meaningful Differences for SMACEX Eddy Covariance Measurements
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume6
    journal issue6
    journal titleJournal of Hydrometeorology
    identifier doi10.1175/JHM458.1
    journal fristpage805
    journal lastpage811
    treeJournal of Hydrometeorology:;2005:;Volume( 006 ):;issue: 006
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian