YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Climate
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Climate
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Uncertainty in Model Climate Sensitivity Traced to Representations of Cumulus Precipitation Microphysics

    Source: Journal of Climate:;2015:;volume( 029 ):;issue: 002::page 543
    Author:
    Zhao, Ming
    ,
    Golaz, J.-C.
    ,
    Held, I. M.
    ,
    Ramaswamy, V.
    ,
    Lin, S.-J.
    ,
    Ming, Y.
    ,
    Ginoux, P.
    ,
    Wyman, B.
    ,
    Donner, L. J.
    ,
    Paynter, D.
    ,
    Guo, H.
    DOI: 10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0191.1
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: ncertainty in equilibrium climate sensitivity impedes accurate climate projections. While the intermodel spread is known to arise primarily from differences in cloud feedback, the exact processes responsible for the spread remain unclear. To help identify some key sources of uncertainty, the authors use a developmental version of the next-generation Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory global climate model (GCM) to construct a tightly controlled set of GCMs where only the formulation of convective precipitation is changed. The different models provide simulation of present-day climatology of comparable quality compared to the model ensemble from phase 5 of CMIP (CMIP5). The authors demonstrate that model estimates of climate sensitivity can be strongly affected by the manner through which cumulus cloud condensate is converted into precipitation in a model?s convection parameterization, processes that are only crudely accounted for in GCMs. In particular, two commonly used methods for converting cumulus condensate into precipitation can lead to drastically different climate sensitivity, as estimated here with an atmosphere?land model by increasing sea surface temperatures uniformly and examining the response in the top-of-atmosphere energy balance. The effect can be quantified through a bulk convective detrainment efficiency, which measures the ability of cumulus convection to generate condensate per unit precipitation. The model differences, dominated by shortwave feedbacks, come from broad regimes ranging from large-scale ascent to subsidence regions. Given current uncertainties in representing convective precipitation microphysics and the current inability to find a clear observational constraint that favors one version of the authors? model over the others, the implications of this ability to engineer climate sensitivity need to be considered when estimating the uncertainty in climate projections.
    • Download: (1.296Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Uncertainty in Model Climate Sensitivity Traced to Representations of Cumulus Precipitation Microphysics

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4224016
    Collections
    • Journal of Climate

    Show full item record

    contributor authorZhao, Ming
    contributor authorGolaz, J.-C.
    contributor authorHeld, I. M.
    contributor authorRamaswamy, V.
    contributor authorLin, S.-J.
    contributor authorMing, Y.
    contributor authorGinoux, P.
    contributor authorWyman, B.
    contributor authorDonner, L. J.
    contributor authorPaynter, D.
    contributor authorGuo, H.
    date accessioned2017-06-09T17:12:20Z
    date available2017-06-09T17:12:20Z
    date copyright2016/01/01
    date issued2015
    identifier issn0894-8755
    identifier otherams-81055.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4224016
    description abstractncertainty in equilibrium climate sensitivity impedes accurate climate projections. While the intermodel spread is known to arise primarily from differences in cloud feedback, the exact processes responsible for the spread remain unclear. To help identify some key sources of uncertainty, the authors use a developmental version of the next-generation Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory global climate model (GCM) to construct a tightly controlled set of GCMs where only the formulation of convective precipitation is changed. The different models provide simulation of present-day climatology of comparable quality compared to the model ensemble from phase 5 of CMIP (CMIP5). The authors demonstrate that model estimates of climate sensitivity can be strongly affected by the manner through which cumulus cloud condensate is converted into precipitation in a model?s convection parameterization, processes that are only crudely accounted for in GCMs. In particular, two commonly used methods for converting cumulus condensate into precipitation can lead to drastically different climate sensitivity, as estimated here with an atmosphere?land model by increasing sea surface temperatures uniformly and examining the response in the top-of-atmosphere energy balance. The effect can be quantified through a bulk convective detrainment efficiency, which measures the ability of cumulus convection to generate condensate per unit precipitation. The model differences, dominated by shortwave feedbacks, come from broad regimes ranging from large-scale ascent to subsidence regions. Given current uncertainties in representing convective precipitation microphysics and the current inability to find a clear observational constraint that favors one version of the authors? model over the others, the implications of this ability to engineer climate sensitivity need to be considered when estimating the uncertainty in climate projections.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleUncertainty in Model Climate Sensitivity Traced to Representations of Cumulus Precipitation Microphysics
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume29
    journal issue2
    journal titleJournal of Climate
    identifier doi10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0191.1
    journal fristpage543
    journal lastpage560
    treeJournal of Climate:;2015:;volume( 029 ):;issue: 002
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian