YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Climate
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Climate
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Comparing Sudden Stratospheric Warming Definitions in Reanalysis Data

    Source: Journal of Climate:;2015:;volume( 028 ):;issue: 017::page 6823
    Author:
    Palmeiro, Froila M.
    ,
    Barriopedro, David
    ,
    García-Herrera, Ricardo
    ,
    Calvo, Natalia
    DOI: 10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0004.1
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: udden stratospheric warmings (SSWs) are characterized by a pronounced increase of the stratospheric polar temperature during the winter season. Different definitions have been used in the literature to diagnose the occurrence of SSWs, yielding discrepancies in the detected events. The aim of this paper is to compare the SSW climatologies obtained by different methods using reanalysis data. The occurrences of Northern Hemisphere SSWs during the extended-winter season and the 1958?2014 period have been identified for a suite of eight representative definitions and three different reanalyses. Overall, and despite the differences in the number and exact dates of occurrence of SSWs, the main climatological signatures of SSWs are not sensitive to the considered reanalysis.The mean frequency of SSWs is 6.7 events decade?1, but it ranges from 4 to 10 events, depending on the method. The seasonal cycle of events is statistically indistinguishable across definitions, with a common peak in January. However, the multidecadal variability is method dependent, with only two definitions displaying minimum frequencies in the 1990s. An analysis of the mean signatures of SSWs in the stratosphere revealed negligible differences among methods compared to the large case-to-case variability within a given definition.The stronger and more coherent tropospheric signals before and after SSWs are associated with major events, which are detected by most methods. The tropospheric signals of minor SSWs are less robust, representing the largest source of discrepancy across definitions. Therefore, to obtain robust results, future studies on stratosphere?troposphere coupling should aim to minimize the detection of minor warmings.
    • Download: (7.083Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Comparing Sudden Stratospheric Warming Definitions in Reanalysis Data

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4223902
    Collections
    • Journal of Climate

    Show full item record

    contributor authorPalmeiro, Froila M.
    contributor authorBarriopedro, David
    contributor authorGarcía-Herrera, Ricardo
    contributor authorCalvo, Natalia
    date accessioned2017-06-09T17:11:53Z
    date available2017-06-09T17:11:53Z
    date copyright2015/09/01
    date issued2015
    identifier issn0894-8755
    identifier otherams-80953.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4223902
    description abstractudden stratospheric warmings (SSWs) are characterized by a pronounced increase of the stratospheric polar temperature during the winter season. Different definitions have been used in the literature to diagnose the occurrence of SSWs, yielding discrepancies in the detected events. The aim of this paper is to compare the SSW climatologies obtained by different methods using reanalysis data. The occurrences of Northern Hemisphere SSWs during the extended-winter season and the 1958?2014 period have been identified for a suite of eight representative definitions and three different reanalyses. Overall, and despite the differences in the number and exact dates of occurrence of SSWs, the main climatological signatures of SSWs are not sensitive to the considered reanalysis.The mean frequency of SSWs is 6.7 events decade?1, but it ranges from 4 to 10 events, depending on the method. The seasonal cycle of events is statistically indistinguishable across definitions, with a common peak in January. However, the multidecadal variability is method dependent, with only two definitions displaying minimum frequencies in the 1990s. An analysis of the mean signatures of SSWs in the stratosphere revealed negligible differences among methods compared to the large case-to-case variability within a given definition.The stronger and more coherent tropospheric signals before and after SSWs are associated with major events, which are detected by most methods. The tropospheric signals of minor SSWs are less robust, representing the largest source of discrepancy across definitions. Therefore, to obtain robust results, future studies on stratosphere?troposphere coupling should aim to minimize the detection of minor warmings.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleComparing Sudden Stratospheric Warming Definitions in Reanalysis Data
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume28
    journal issue17
    journal titleJournal of Climate
    identifier doi10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0004.1
    journal fristpage6823
    journal lastpage6840
    treeJournal of Climate:;2015:;volume( 028 ):;issue: 017
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian