YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Climate
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Climate
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Toward Assessing NARCCAP Regional Climate Model Credibility for the North American Monsoon: Future Climate Simulations

    Source: Journal of Climate:;2015:;volume( 028 ):;issue: 017::page 6707
    Author:
    Bukovsky, Melissa S.
    ,
    Carrillo, Carlos M.
    ,
    Gochis, David J.
    ,
    Hammerling, Dorit M.
    ,
    McCrary, Rachel R.
    ,
    Mearns, Linda O.
    DOI: 10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00695.1
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: his study presents climate change results from the North American Regional Climate Change Assessment Program (NARCCAP) suite of dynamically downscaled simulations for the North American monsoon system in the southwestern United States and northwestern Mexico. The focus is on changes in precipitation and the processes driving the projected changes from the regional climate simulations and their driving coupled atmosphere?ocean global climate models. The effect of known biases on the projections is also examined. Overall, there is strong ensemble agreement for a large decrease in precipitation during the monsoon season; however, this agreement and the magnitude of the ensemble-mean change is likely deceiving, as the greatest decreases are produced by the simulations that are the most biased in the baseline/current climate. Furthermore, some of the greatest decreases in precipitation are being driven by changes in processes/phenomena that are less credible (e.g., changes in El Niño?Southern Oscillation, when it is initially not simulated well). In other simulations, the processes driving the precipitation change may be plausible, but other biases (e.g., biases in low-level moisture or precipitation intensity) appear to be affecting the magnitude of the projected changes. The most and least credible simulations are clearly identified, while the other simulations are mixed in their abilities to produce projections of value.
    • Download: (4.941Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Toward Assessing NARCCAP Regional Climate Model Credibility for the North American Monsoon: Future Climate Simulations

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4223787
    Collections
    • Journal of Climate

    Show full item record

    contributor authorBukovsky, Melissa S.
    contributor authorCarrillo, Carlos M.
    contributor authorGochis, David J.
    contributor authorHammerling, Dorit M.
    contributor authorMcCrary, Rachel R.
    contributor authorMearns, Linda O.
    date accessioned2017-06-09T17:11:29Z
    date available2017-06-09T17:11:29Z
    date copyright2015/09/01
    date issued2015
    identifier issn0894-8755
    identifier otherams-80850.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4223787
    description abstracthis study presents climate change results from the North American Regional Climate Change Assessment Program (NARCCAP) suite of dynamically downscaled simulations for the North American monsoon system in the southwestern United States and northwestern Mexico. The focus is on changes in precipitation and the processes driving the projected changes from the regional climate simulations and their driving coupled atmosphere?ocean global climate models. The effect of known biases on the projections is also examined. Overall, there is strong ensemble agreement for a large decrease in precipitation during the monsoon season; however, this agreement and the magnitude of the ensemble-mean change is likely deceiving, as the greatest decreases are produced by the simulations that are the most biased in the baseline/current climate. Furthermore, some of the greatest decreases in precipitation are being driven by changes in processes/phenomena that are less credible (e.g., changes in El Niño?Southern Oscillation, when it is initially not simulated well). In other simulations, the processes driving the precipitation change may be plausible, but other biases (e.g., biases in low-level moisture or precipitation intensity) appear to be affecting the magnitude of the projected changes. The most and least credible simulations are clearly identified, while the other simulations are mixed in their abilities to produce projections of value.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleToward Assessing NARCCAP Regional Climate Model Credibility for the North American Monsoon: Future Climate Simulations
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume28
    journal issue17
    journal titleJournal of Climate
    identifier doi10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00695.1
    journal fristpage6707
    journal lastpage6728
    treeJournal of Climate:;2015:;volume( 028 ):;issue: 017
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian