YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Climate
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Climate
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Evaluation of CMIP5 Models in the Context of Dynamical Downscaling over Europe

    Source: Journal of Climate:;2015:;volume( 028 ):;issue: 014::page 5575
    Author:
    Jury, Martin W.
    ,
    Prein, Andreas F.
    ,
    Truhetz, Heimo
    ,
    Gobiet, Andreas
    DOI: 10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00430.1
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: he quality of regional climate model (RCM) simulations is strongly dependent on the quality of data provided as lateral boundary conditions (LBCs). Frequently, the quality of near-surface variables of general circulation model (GCM) simulations like those from phase 5 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5) is analyzed in the region of interest. However, such analysis does not necessarily lead to the selection of high-quality LBCs, as demonstrated in this study. The study region is the European domain of the Coordinated Regional Climate Downscaling Experiment (EURO-CORDEX), where a model performance index (MPI) is used to evaluate the skill of CMIP5 GCMs to reproduce near-surface variables within the EURO-CORDEX domain and free atmosphere variables along its lateral boundaries as a proxy for LBCs used in regional climate modeling. The results suggest that a GCM?s skill in simulating near-surface variables is correlated with 0.62 (Spearman?s r) to its skill in simulating LBCs for regional climate simulations. However, there is hardly any correlation between the performances of different variables, implying that a GCM evaluation solely based on surface parameters or a few variables is inadequate to select suitable driving data for regional climate models. The selection should include the evaluation of all variables passed to the RCM as LBCs in the lateral boundary zone (LBZ) on at least one midtropospheric level.
    • Download: (1.476Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Evaluation of CMIP5 Models in the Context of Dynamical Downscaling over Europe

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4223593
    Collections
    • Journal of Climate

    Show full item record

    contributor authorJury, Martin W.
    contributor authorPrein, Andreas F.
    contributor authorTruhetz, Heimo
    contributor authorGobiet, Andreas
    date accessioned2017-06-09T17:10:52Z
    date available2017-06-09T17:10:52Z
    date copyright2015/07/01
    date issued2015
    identifier issn0894-8755
    identifier otherams-80675.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4223593
    description abstracthe quality of regional climate model (RCM) simulations is strongly dependent on the quality of data provided as lateral boundary conditions (LBCs). Frequently, the quality of near-surface variables of general circulation model (GCM) simulations like those from phase 5 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5) is analyzed in the region of interest. However, such analysis does not necessarily lead to the selection of high-quality LBCs, as demonstrated in this study. The study region is the European domain of the Coordinated Regional Climate Downscaling Experiment (EURO-CORDEX), where a model performance index (MPI) is used to evaluate the skill of CMIP5 GCMs to reproduce near-surface variables within the EURO-CORDEX domain and free atmosphere variables along its lateral boundaries as a proxy for LBCs used in regional climate modeling. The results suggest that a GCM?s skill in simulating near-surface variables is correlated with 0.62 (Spearman?s r) to its skill in simulating LBCs for regional climate simulations. However, there is hardly any correlation between the performances of different variables, implying that a GCM evaluation solely based on surface parameters or a few variables is inadequate to select suitable driving data for regional climate models. The selection should include the evaluation of all variables passed to the RCM as LBCs in the lateral boundary zone (LBZ) on at least one midtropospheric level.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleEvaluation of CMIP5 Models in the Context of Dynamical Downscaling over Europe
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume28
    journal issue14
    journal titleJournal of Climate
    identifier doi10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00430.1
    journal fristpage5575
    journal lastpage5582
    treeJournal of Climate:;2015:;volume( 028 ):;issue: 014
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian