The Role of Clouds in Modulating Global Aerosol Direct Radiative Effects in Spaceborne Active Observations and the Community Earth System ModelSource: Journal of Climate:;2015:;volume( 028 ):;issue: 008::page 2986Author:Matus, Alexander V.
,
L’Ecuyer, Tristan S.
,
Kay, Jennifer E.
,
Hannay, Cecile
,
Lamarque, Jean-Francois
DOI: 10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00426.1Publisher: American Meteorological Society
Abstract: bservational benchmarks of global and regional aerosol direct radiative effects, over all surfaces and all sky conditions, are generated using CloudSat?s new multisensor radiative fluxes and heating rates product. Improving upon previous techniques, the approach leverages the capability of CloudSat and CALIPSO to retrieve vertically resolved estimates of cloud and aerosol properties required for complete and accurate assessment of aerosol direct effects under all conditions. The global annually averaged aerosol direct radiative effect is estimated to be ?1.9 W m?2 with an uncertainty range of ±0.6 W m?2, which is in better agreement with previously published estimates from global models than previous satellite-based estimates. Detailed comparisons against a fully coupled simulation of the Community Earth System Model, however, reveal that this agreement on the global annual mean masks large regional discrepancies between modeled and observed estimates of aerosol direct effects. A series of regional analyses demonstrate that, in addition to previously documented biases in simulated aerosol distributions, the magnitude and sign of these discrepancies are often related to model biases in the geographic and seasonal distribution of clouds. A low bias in stratocumulus cloud cover over the southeastern Pacific, for example, leads to an overestimate of the radiative effects of marine aerosols in the region. Likewise, errors in the seasonal cycle of low clouds in the southeastern Atlantic distort the radiative effects of biomass burning aerosols from southern Africa. These findings indicate that accurate assessment of aerosol direct effects requires models to correctly represent not only the source, strength, and optical properties of aerosols, but their relative proximity to clouds as well.
|
Collections
Show full item record
contributor author | Matus, Alexander V. | |
contributor author | L’Ecuyer, Tristan S. | |
contributor author | Kay, Jennifer E. | |
contributor author | Hannay, Cecile | |
contributor author | Lamarque, Jean-Francois | |
date accessioned | 2017-06-09T17:10:52Z | |
date available | 2017-06-09T17:10:52Z | |
date copyright | 2015/04/01 | |
date issued | 2015 | |
identifier issn | 0894-8755 | |
identifier other | ams-80672.pdf | |
identifier uri | http://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4223590 | |
description abstract | bservational benchmarks of global and regional aerosol direct radiative effects, over all surfaces and all sky conditions, are generated using CloudSat?s new multisensor radiative fluxes and heating rates product. Improving upon previous techniques, the approach leverages the capability of CloudSat and CALIPSO to retrieve vertically resolved estimates of cloud and aerosol properties required for complete and accurate assessment of aerosol direct effects under all conditions. The global annually averaged aerosol direct radiative effect is estimated to be ?1.9 W m?2 with an uncertainty range of ±0.6 W m?2, which is in better agreement with previously published estimates from global models than previous satellite-based estimates. Detailed comparisons against a fully coupled simulation of the Community Earth System Model, however, reveal that this agreement on the global annual mean masks large regional discrepancies between modeled and observed estimates of aerosol direct effects. A series of regional analyses demonstrate that, in addition to previously documented biases in simulated aerosol distributions, the magnitude and sign of these discrepancies are often related to model biases in the geographic and seasonal distribution of clouds. A low bias in stratocumulus cloud cover over the southeastern Pacific, for example, leads to an overestimate of the radiative effects of marine aerosols in the region. Likewise, errors in the seasonal cycle of low clouds in the southeastern Atlantic distort the radiative effects of biomass burning aerosols from southern Africa. These findings indicate that accurate assessment of aerosol direct effects requires models to correctly represent not only the source, strength, and optical properties of aerosols, but their relative proximity to clouds as well. | |
publisher | American Meteorological Society | |
title | The Role of Clouds in Modulating Global Aerosol Direct Radiative Effects in Spaceborne Active Observations and the Community Earth System Model | |
type | Journal Paper | |
journal volume | 28 | |
journal issue | 8 | |
journal title | Journal of Climate | |
identifier doi | 10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00426.1 | |
journal fristpage | 2986 | |
journal lastpage | 3003 | |
tree | Journal of Climate:;2015:;volume( 028 ):;issue: 008 | |
contenttype | Fulltext |