ENSO Prediction in Project Minerva: Sensitivity to Atmospheric Horizontal Resolution and Ensemble SizeSource: Journal of Climate:;2014:;volume( 028 ):;issue: 005::page 2080Author:Zhu, Jieshun
,
Huang, Bohua
,
Cash, Ben
,
Kinter, James L.
,
Manganello, Julia
,
Barimalala, Rondrotiana
,
Altshuler, Eric
,
Vitart, Frederic
,
Molteni, Franco
,
Towers, Peter
DOI: 10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00302.1Publisher: American Meteorological Society
Abstract: his study examines El Niño?Southern Oscillation (ENSO) prediction in Project Minerva, a recent collaboration between the Center for Ocean?Land?Atmosphere Studies (COLA) and the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF). The focus is primarily on the impact of the atmospheric horizontal resolution on ENSO prediction, but the effect from different ensemble sizes is also discussed. Particularly, three sets of 7-month hindcasts performed with ECMWF prediction system are compared, starting from 1 May (1 November) during 1982?2011 (1982?2010): spectral T319 atmospheric resolution with 15 ensembles, spectral T639 with 15 ensembles, and spectral T319 with 51 ensembles. The analysis herein shows that simply increasing either ensemble size from 15 to 51 or atmospheric horizontal resolution from T319 to T639 does not necessarily lead to major improvement in the ENSO prediction skill with current climate models. For deterministic prediction skill metrics, the three sets of predictions do not produce a significant difference in either anomaly correlation or root-mean-square error (RMSE). For probabilistic metrics, the increased atmospheric horizontal resolution generates larger ensemble spread, and thus increases the ratio between the intraensemble spread and RMSE. However, there is little change in the categorical distributions of predicted SST anomalies, and consequently there is little difference among the three sets of hindcasts in terms of probabilistic metrics or prediction reliability.
|
Collections
Show full item record
| contributor author | Zhu, Jieshun | |
| contributor author | Huang, Bohua | |
| contributor author | Cash, Ben | |
| contributor author | Kinter, James L. | |
| contributor author | Manganello, Julia | |
| contributor author | Barimalala, Rondrotiana | |
| contributor author | Altshuler, Eric | |
| contributor author | Vitart, Frederic | |
| contributor author | Molteni, Franco | |
| contributor author | Towers, Peter | |
| date accessioned | 2017-06-09T17:10:33Z | |
| date available | 2017-06-09T17:10:33Z | |
| date copyright | 2015/03/01 | |
| date issued | 2014 | |
| identifier issn | 0894-8755 | |
| identifier other | ams-80587.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4223495 | |
| description abstract | his study examines El Niño?Southern Oscillation (ENSO) prediction in Project Minerva, a recent collaboration between the Center for Ocean?Land?Atmosphere Studies (COLA) and the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF). The focus is primarily on the impact of the atmospheric horizontal resolution on ENSO prediction, but the effect from different ensemble sizes is also discussed. Particularly, three sets of 7-month hindcasts performed with ECMWF prediction system are compared, starting from 1 May (1 November) during 1982?2011 (1982?2010): spectral T319 atmospheric resolution with 15 ensembles, spectral T639 with 15 ensembles, and spectral T319 with 51 ensembles. The analysis herein shows that simply increasing either ensemble size from 15 to 51 or atmospheric horizontal resolution from T319 to T639 does not necessarily lead to major improvement in the ENSO prediction skill with current climate models. For deterministic prediction skill metrics, the three sets of predictions do not produce a significant difference in either anomaly correlation or root-mean-square error (RMSE). For probabilistic metrics, the increased atmospheric horizontal resolution generates larger ensemble spread, and thus increases the ratio between the intraensemble spread and RMSE. However, there is little change in the categorical distributions of predicted SST anomalies, and consequently there is little difference among the three sets of hindcasts in terms of probabilistic metrics or prediction reliability. | |
| publisher | American Meteorological Society | |
| title | ENSO Prediction in Project Minerva: Sensitivity to Atmospheric Horizontal Resolution and Ensemble Size | |
| type | Journal Paper | |
| journal volume | 28 | |
| journal issue | 5 | |
| journal title | Journal of Climate | |
| identifier doi | 10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00302.1 | |
| journal fristpage | 2080 | |
| journal lastpage | 2095 | |
| tree | Journal of Climate:;2014:;volume( 028 ):;issue: 005 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext |