YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Climate
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Climate
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Robust Seasonality of Arctic Warming Processes in Two Different Versions of the MIROC GCM

    Source: Journal of Climate:;2014:;volume( 027 ):;issue: 016::page 6358
    Author:
    Yoshimori, Masakazu
    ,
    Abe-Ouchi, Ayako
    ,
    Watanabe, Masahiro
    ,
    Oka, Akira
    ,
    Ogura, Tomoo
    DOI: 10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00086.1
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: t is one of the most robust projected responses of climate models to the increase of atmospheric CO2 concentration that the Arctic experiences a rapid warming with a magnitude larger than the rest of the world. While many processes are proposed as important, the relative contribution of individual processes to the Arctic warming is not often investigated systematically. Feedbacks are quantified in two different versions of an atmosphere?ocean GCM under idealized transient experiments based on an energy balance analysis that extends from the surface to the top of the atmosphere. The emphasis is placed on the largest warming from late autumn to early winter (October?December) and the difference from other seasons. It is confirmed that dominating processes vary with season. In autumn, the largest contribution to the Arctic surface warming is made by a reduction of ocean heat storage and cloud radiative feedback. In the annual mean, on the other hand, it is the albedo feedback that contributes the most, with increasing ocean heat uptake to the deeper layers working as a negative feedback. While the qualitative results are robust between the two models, they differ quantitatively, indicating the need for further constraint on each process. Ocean heat uptake, lower tropospheric stability, and low-level cloud response probably require special attention.
    • Download: (3.240Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Robust Seasonality of Arctic Warming Processes in Two Different Versions of the MIROC GCM

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4223338
    Collections
    • Journal of Climate

    Show full item record

    contributor authorYoshimori, Masakazu
    contributor authorAbe-Ouchi, Ayako
    contributor authorWatanabe, Masahiro
    contributor authorOka, Akira
    contributor authorOgura, Tomoo
    date accessioned2017-06-09T17:10:02Z
    date available2017-06-09T17:10:02Z
    date copyright2014/08/01
    date issued2014
    identifier issn0894-8755
    identifier otherams-80445.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4223338
    description abstractt is one of the most robust projected responses of climate models to the increase of atmospheric CO2 concentration that the Arctic experiences a rapid warming with a magnitude larger than the rest of the world. While many processes are proposed as important, the relative contribution of individual processes to the Arctic warming is not often investigated systematically. Feedbacks are quantified in two different versions of an atmosphere?ocean GCM under idealized transient experiments based on an energy balance analysis that extends from the surface to the top of the atmosphere. The emphasis is placed on the largest warming from late autumn to early winter (October?December) and the difference from other seasons. It is confirmed that dominating processes vary with season. In autumn, the largest contribution to the Arctic surface warming is made by a reduction of ocean heat storage and cloud radiative feedback. In the annual mean, on the other hand, it is the albedo feedback that contributes the most, with increasing ocean heat uptake to the deeper layers working as a negative feedback. While the qualitative results are robust between the two models, they differ quantitatively, indicating the need for further constraint on each process. Ocean heat uptake, lower tropospheric stability, and low-level cloud response probably require special attention.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleRobust Seasonality of Arctic Warming Processes in Two Different Versions of the MIROC GCM
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume27
    journal issue16
    journal titleJournal of Climate
    identifier doi10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00086.1
    journal fristpage6358
    journal lastpage6375
    treeJournal of Climate:;2014:;volume( 027 ):;issue: 016
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian