YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Climate
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Climate
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Predictability and Prediction Skill of the MJO in Two Operational Forecasting Systems

    Source: Journal of Climate:;2014:;volume( 027 ):;issue: 014::page 5364
    Author:
    Kim, Hye-Mi
    ,
    Webster, Peter J.
    ,
    Toma, Violeta E.
    ,
    Kim, Daehyun
    DOI: 10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00480.1
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: he authors examine the predictability and prediction skill of the Madden?Julian oscillation (MJO) of two ocean?atmosphere coupled forecast systems of ECMWF [Variable Resolution Ensemble Prediction System (VarEPS)] and NCEP [Climate Forecast System, version 2 (CFSv2)]. The VarEPS hindcasts possess five ensemble members for the period 1993?2009 and the CFSv2 hindcasts possess three ensemble members for the period 2000?09. Predictability and prediction skill are estimated by the bivariate correlation coefficient between the observed and predicted Wheeler?Hendon real-time multivariate MJO index (RMM). MJO predictability is beyond 32 days lead time in both hindcasts, while the prediction skill is about 27 days in VarEPS and 21 days in CFSv2 as measured by the bivariate correlation exceeding 0.5. Both predictability and prediction skill of MJO are enhanced by averaging ensembles. Results show clearly that forecasts initialized with (or targeting) strong MJOs possess greater prediction skill compared to those initialized with (or targeting) weak or nonexistent MJOs. The predictability is insensitive to the initial MJO phase (or forecast target phase), although the prediction skill varies with MJO phases.A few common model issues are identified. In both hindcasts, the MJO propagation speed is slower and the MJO amplitude is weaker than observed. Also, both ensemble forecast systems are underdispersive, meaning that the growth rate of ensemble error is greater than the growth rate of the ensemble spread by lead time.
    • Download: (3.121Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Predictability and Prediction Skill of the MJO in Two Operational Forecasting Systems

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4223082
    Collections
    • Journal of Climate

    Show full item record

    contributor authorKim, Hye-Mi
    contributor authorWebster, Peter J.
    contributor authorToma, Violeta E.
    contributor authorKim, Daehyun
    date accessioned2017-06-09T17:09:11Z
    date available2017-06-09T17:09:11Z
    date copyright2014/07/01
    date issued2014
    identifier issn0894-8755
    identifier otherams-80214.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4223082
    description abstracthe authors examine the predictability and prediction skill of the Madden?Julian oscillation (MJO) of two ocean?atmosphere coupled forecast systems of ECMWF [Variable Resolution Ensemble Prediction System (VarEPS)] and NCEP [Climate Forecast System, version 2 (CFSv2)]. The VarEPS hindcasts possess five ensemble members for the period 1993?2009 and the CFSv2 hindcasts possess three ensemble members for the period 2000?09. Predictability and prediction skill are estimated by the bivariate correlation coefficient between the observed and predicted Wheeler?Hendon real-time multivariate MJO index (RMM). MJO predictability is beyond 32 days lead time in both hindcasts, while the prediction skill is about 27 days in VarEPS and 21 days in CFSv2 as measured by the bivariate correlation exceeding 0.5. Both predictability and prediction skill of MJO are enhanced by averaging ensembles. Results show clearly that forecasts initialized with (or targeting) strong MJOs possess greater prediction skill compared to those initialized with (or targeting) weak or nonexistent MJOs. The predictability is insensitive to the initial MJO phase (or forecast target phase), although the prediction skill varies with MJO phases.A few common model issues are identified. In both hindcasts, the MJO propagation speed is slower and the MJO amplitude is weaker than observed. Also, both ensemble forecast systems are underdispersive, meaning that the growth rate of ensemble error is greater than the growth rate of the ensemble spread by lead time.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titlePredictability and Prediction Skill of the MJO in Two Operational Forecasting Systems
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume27
    journal issue14
    journal titleJournal of Climate
    identifier doi10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00480.1
    journal fristpage5364
    journal lastpage5378
    treeJournal of Climate:;2014:;volume( 027 ):;issue: 014
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian