YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Climate
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Climate
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Climate Drift in the CMIP5 Models

    Source: Journal of Climate:;2013:;volume( 026 ):;issue: 021::page 8597
    Author:
    Gupta, Alexander Sen
    ,
    Jourdain, Nicolas C.
    ,
    Brown, Jaclyn N.
    ,
    Monselesan, Didier
    DOI: 10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00521.1
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: limate models often exhibit spurious long-term changes independent of either internal variability or changes to external forcing. Such changes, referred to as model ?drift,? may distort the estimate of forced change in transient climate simulations. The importance of drift is examined in comparison to historical trends over recent decades in the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP). Comparison based on a selection of metrics suggests a significant overall reduction in the magnitude of drift from phase 3 of CMIP (CMIP3) to phase 5 of CMIP (CMIP5). The direction of both ocean and atmospheric drift is systematically biased in some models introducing statistically significant drift in globally averaged metrics. Nevertheless, for most models globally averaged drift remains weak compared to the associated forced trends and is often smaller than the difference between trends derived from different ensemble members or the error introduced by the aliasing of natural variability. An exception to this is metrics that include the deep ocean (e.g., steric sea level) where drift can dominate in forced simulations. In such circumstances drift must be corrected for using information from concurrent control experiments. Many CMIP5 models now include ocean biogeochemistry. Like physical models, biogeochemical models generally undergo long spinup integrations to minimize drift. Nevertheless, based on a limited subset of models, it is found that drift is an important consideration and must be accounted for. For properties or regions where drift is important, the drift correction method must be carefully considered. The use of a drift estimate based on the full control time series is recommended to minimize the contamination of the drift estimate by internal variability.
    • Download: (3.797Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Climate Drift in the CMIP5 Models

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4222493
    Collections
    • Journal of Climate

    Show full item record

    contributor authorGupta, Alexander Sen
    contributor authorJourdain, Nicolas C.
    contributor authorBrown, Jaclyn N.
    contributor authorMonselesan, Didier
    date accessioned2017-06-09T17:07:15Z
    date available2017-06-09T17:07:15Z
    date copyright2013/11/01
    date issued2013
    identifier issn0894-8755
    identifier otherams-79686.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4222493
    description abstractlimate models often exhibit spurious long-term changes independent of either internal variability or changes to external forcing. Such changes, referred to as model ?drift,? may distort the estimate of forced change in transient climate simulations. The importance of drift is examined in comparison to historical trends over recent decades in the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP). Comparison based on a selection of metrics suggests a significant overall reduction in the magnitude of drift from phase 3 of CMIP (CMIP3) to phase 5 of CMIP (CMIP5). The direction of both ocean and atmospheric drift is systematically biased in some models introducing statistically significant drift in globally averaged metrics. Nevertheless, for most models globally averaged drift remains weak compared to the associated forced trends and is often smaller than the difference between trends derived from different ensemble members or the error introduced by the aliasing of natural variability. An exception to this is metrics that include the deep ocean (e.g., steric sea level) where drift can dominate in forced simulations. In such circumstances drift must be corrected for using information from concurrent control experiments. Many CMIP5 models now include ocean biogeochemistry. Like physical models, biogeochemical models generally undergo long spinup integrations to minimize drift. Nevertheless, based on a limited subset of models, it is found that drift is an important consideration and must be accounted for. For properties or regions where drift is important, the drift correction method must be carefully considered. The use of a drift estimate based on the full control time series is recommended to minimize the contamination of the drift estimate by internal variability.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleClimate Drift in the CMIP5 Models
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume26
    journal issue21
    journal titleJournal of Climate
    identifier doi10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00521.1
    journal fristpage8597
    journal lastpage8615
    treeJournal of Climate:;2013:;volume( 026 ):;issue: 021
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian