Evaluating the Land and Ocean Components of the Global Carbon Cycle in the CMIP5 Earth System ModelsSource: Journal of Climate:;2013:;volume( 026 ):;issue: 018::page 6801Author:Anav, A.
,
Friedlingstein, P.
,
Kidston, M.
,
Bopp, L.
,
Ciais, P.
,
Cox, P.
,
Jones, C.
,
Jung, M.
,
Myneni, R.
,
Zhu, Z.
DOI: 10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00417.1Publisher: American Meteorological Society
Abstract: he authors assess the ability of 18 Earth system models to simulate the land and ocean carbon cycle for the present climate. These models will be used in the next Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Fifth Assessment Report (AR5) for climate projections, and such evaluation allows identification of the strengths and weaknesses of individual coupled carbon?climate models as well as identification of systematic biases of the models. Results show that models correctly reproduce the main climatic variables controlling the spatial and temporal characteristics of the carbon cycle. The seasonal evolution of the variables under examination is well captured. However, weaknesses appear when reproducing specific fields: in particular, considering the land carbon cycle, a general overestimation of photosynthesis and leaf area index is found for most of the models, while the ocean evaluation shows that quite a few models underestimate the primary production.The authors also propose climate and carbon cycle performance metrics in order to assess whether there is a set of consistently better models for reproducing the carbon cycle. Averaged seasonal cycles and probability density functions (PDFs) calculated from model simulations are compared with the corresponding seasonal cycles and PDFs from different observed datasets. Although the metrics used in this study allow identification of some models as better or worse than the average, the ranking of this study is partially subjective because of the choice of the variables under examination and also can be sensitive to the choice of reference data. In addition, it was found that the model performances show significant regional variations.
|
Collections
Show full item record
contributor author | Anav, A. | |
contributor author | Friedlingstein, P. | |
contributor author | Kidston, M. | |
contributor author | Bopp, L. | |
contributor author | Ciais, P. | |
contributor author | Cox, P. | |
contributor author | Jones, C. | |
contributor author | Jung, M. | |
contributor author | Myneni, R. | |
contributor author | Zhu, Z. | |
date accessioned | 2017-06-09T17:06:57Z | |
date available | 2017-06-09T17:06:57Z | |
date copyright | 2013/09/01 | |
date issued | 2013 | |
identifier issn | 0894-8755 | |
identifier other | ams-79611.pdf | |
identifier uri | http://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4222410 | |
description abstract | he authors assess the ability of 18 Earth system models to simulate the land and ocean carbon cycle for the present climate. These models will be used in the next Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Fifth Assessment Report (AR5) for climate projections, and such evaluation allows identification of the strengths and weaknesses of individual coupled carbon?climate models as well as identification of systematic biases of the models. Results show that models correctly reproduce the main climatic variables controlling the spatial and temporal characteristics of the carbon cycle. The seasonal evolution of the variables under examination is well captured. However, weaknesses appear when reproducing specific fields: in particular, considering the land carbon cycle, a general overestimation of photosynthesis and leaf area index is found for most of the models, while the ocean evaluation shows that quite a few models underestimate the primary production.The authors also propose climate and carbon cycle performance metrics in order to assess whether there is a set of consistently better models for reproducing the carbon cycle. Averaged seasonal cycles and probability density functions (PDFs) calculated from model simulations are compared with the corresponding seasonal cycles and PDFs from different observed datasets. Although the metrics used in this study allow identification of some models as better or worse than the average, the ranking of this study is partially subjective because of the choice of the variables under examination and also can be sensitive to the choice of reference data. In addition, it was found that the model performances show significant regional variations. | |
publisher | American Meteorological Society | |
title | Evaluating the Land and Ocean Components of the Global Carbon Cycle in the CMIP5 Earth System Models | |
type | Journal Paper | |
journal volume | 26 | |
journal issue | 18 | |
journal title | Journal of Climate | |
identifier doi | 10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00417.1 | |
journal fristpage | 6801 | |
journal lastpage | 6843 | |
tree | Journal of Climate:;2013:;volume( 026 ):;issue: 018 | |
contenttype | Fulltext |