YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Climate
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Climate
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    GFDL’s ESM2 Global Coupled Climate–Carbon Earth System Models. Part II: Carbon System Formulation and Baseline Simulation Characteristics

    Source: Journal of Climate:;2012:;volume( 026 ):;issue: 007::page 2247
    Author:
    Dunne, John P.
    ,
    John, Jasmin G.
    ,
    Shevliakova, Elena
    ,
    Stouffer, Ronald J.
    ,
    Krasting, John P.
    ,
    Malyshev, Sergey L.
    ,
    Milly, P. C. D.
    ,
    Sentman, Lori T.
    ,
    Adcroft, Alistair J.
    ,
    Cooke, William
    ,
    Dunne, Krista A.
    ,
    Griffies, Stephen M.
    ,
    Hallberg, Robert W.
    ,
    Harrison, Matthew J.
    ,
    Levy, Hiram
    ,
    Wittenberg, Andrew T.
    ,
    Phillips, Peter J.
    ,
    Zadeh, Niki
    DOI: 10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00150.1
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: he authors describe carbon system formulation and simulation characteristics of two new global coupled carbon?climate Earth System Models (ESM), ESM2M and ESM2G. These models demonstrate good climate fidelity as described in part I of this study while incorporating explicit and consistent carbon dynamics. The two models differ almost exclusively in the physical ocean component; ESM2M uses the Modular Ocean Model version 4.1 with vertical pressure layers, whereas ESM2G uses generalized ocean layer dynamics with a bulk mixed layer and interior isopycnal layers. On land, both ESMs include a revised land model to simulate competitive vegetation distributions and functioning, including carbon cycling among vegetation, soil, and atmosphere. In the ocean, both models include new biogeochemical algorithms including phytoplankton functional group dynamics with flexible stoichiometry. Preindustrial simulations are spun up to give stable, realistic carbon cycle means and variability. Significant differences in simulation characteristics of these two models are described. Because of differences in oceanic ventilation rates, ESM2M has a stronger biological carbon pump but weaker northward implied atmospheric CO2 transport than ESM2G. The major advantages of ESM2G over ESM2M are improved representation of surface chlorophyll in the Atlantic and Indian Oceans and thermocline nutrients and oxygen in the North Pacific. Improved tree mortality parameters in ESM2G produced more realistic carbon accumulation in vegetation pools. The major advantages of ESM2M over ESM2G are reduced nutrient and oxygen biases in the southern and tropical oceans.
    • Download: (9.370Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      GFDL’s ESM2 Global Coupled Climate–Carbon Earth System Models. Part II: Carbon System Formulation and Baseline Simulation Characteristics

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4222220
    Collections
    • Journal of Climate

    Show full item record

    contributor authorDunne, John P.
    contributor authorJohn, Jasmin G.
    contributor authorShevliakova, Elena
    contributor authorStouffer, Ronald J.
    contributor authorKrasting, John P.
    contributor authorMalyshev, Sergey L.
    contributor authorMilly, P. C. D.
    contributor authorSentman, Lori T.
    contributor authorAdcroft, Alistair J.
    contributor authorCooke, William
    contributor authorDunne, Krista A.
    contributor authorGriffies, Stephen M.
    contributor authorHallberg, Robert W.
    contributor authorHarrison, Matthew J.
    contributor authorLevy, Hiram
    contributor authorWittenberg, Andrew T.
    contributor authorPhillips, Peter J.
    contributor authorZadeh, Niki
    date accessioned2017-06-09T17:06:15Z
    date available2017-06-09T17:06:15Z
    date copyright2013/04/01
    date issued2012
    identifier issn0894-8755
    identifier otherams-79440.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4222220
    description abstracthe authors describe carbon system formulation and simulation characteristics of two new global coupled carbon?climate Earth System Models (ESM), ESM2M and ESM2G. These models demonstrate good climate fidelity as described in part I of this study while incorporating explicit and consistent carbon dynamics. The two models differ almost exclusively in the physical ocean component; ESM2M uses the Modular Ocean Model version 4.1 with vertical pressure layers, whereas ESM2G uses generalized ocean layer dynamics with a bulk mixed layer and interior isopycnal layers. On land, both ESMs include a revised land model to simulate competitive vegetation distributions and functioning, including carbon cycling among vegetation, soil, and atmosphere. In the ocean, both models include new biogeochemical algorithms including phytoplankton functional group dynamics with flexible stoichiometry. Preindustrial simulations are spun up to give stable, realistic carbon cycle means and variability. Significant differences in simulation characteristics of these two models are described. Because of differences in oceanic ventilation rates, ESM2M has a stronger biological carbon pump but weaker northward implied atmospheric CO2 transport than ESM2G. The major advantages of ESM2G over ESM2M are improved representation of surface chlorophyll in the Atlantic and Indian Oceans and thermocline nutrients and oxygen in the North Pacific. Improved tree mortality parameters in ESM2G produced more realistic carbon accumulation in vegetation pools. The major advantages of ESM2M over ESM2G are reduced nutrient and oxygen biases in the southern and tropical oceans.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleGFDL’s ESM2 Global Coupled Climate–Carbon Earth System Models. Part II: Carbon System Formulation and Baseline Simulation Characteristics
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume26
    journal issue7
    journal titleJournal of Climate
    identifier doi10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00150.1
    journal fristpage2247
    journal lastpage2267
    treeJournal of Climate:;2012:;volume( 026 ):;issue: 007
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian