Longwave Band-By-Band Cloud Radiative Effect and Its Application in GCM EvaluationSource: Journal of Climate:;2012:;volume( 026 ):;issue: 002::page 450Author:Huang, Xianglei
,
Cole, Jason N. S.
,
He, Fei
,
Potter, Gerald L.
,
Oreopoulos, Lazaros
,
Lee, Dongmin
,
Suarez, Max
,
Loeb, Norman G.
DOI: 10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00112.1Publisher: American Meteorological Society
Abstract: he cloud radiative effect (CRE) of each longwave (LW) absorption band of a GCM?s radiation code is uniquely valuable for GCM evaluation because 1) comparing band-by-band CRE avoids the compensating biases in the broadband CRE comparison and 2) the fractional contribution of each band to the LW broadband CRE (fCRE) is sensitive to cloud-top height but largely insensitive to cloud fraction, thereby presenting a diagnostic metric to separate the two macroscopic properties of clouds. Recent studies led by the first author have established methods to derive such band-by-band quantities from collocated Atmospheric Infrared Sounder (AIRS) and Clouds and the Earth?s Radiant Energy System (CERES) observations. A study is presented here that compares the observed band-by-band CRE over the tropical oceans with those simulated by three different atmospheric GCMs?the GFDL Atmospheric Model version 2 (GFDL AM2), NASA Goddard Earth Observing System version 5 (GEOS-5), and the fourth-generation AGCM of the Canadian Centre for Climate Modelling and Analysis (CCCma CanAM4)?forced by observed SST. The models agree with observation on the annual-mean LW broadband CRE over the tropical oceans within ±1 W m?2. However, the differences among these three GCMs in some bands can be as large as or even larger than ±1 W m?2. Observed seasonal cycles of fCRE in major bands are shown to be consistent with the seasonal cycle of cloud-top pressure for both the amplitude and the phase. However, while the three simulated seasonal cycles of fCRE agree with observations on the phase, the amplitudes are underestimated. Simulated interannual anomalies from GFDL AM2 and CCCma CanAM4 are in phase with observed anomalies. The spatial distribution of fCRE highlights the discrepancies between models and observation over the low-cloud regions and the compensating biases from different bands.
|
Collections
Show full item record
contributor author | Huang, Xianglei | |
contributor author | Cole, Jason N. S. | |
contributor author | He, Fei | |
contributor author | Potter, Gerald L. | |
contributor author | Oreopoulos, Lazaros | |
contributor author | Lee, Dongmin | |
contributor author | Suarez, Max | |
contributor author | Loeb, Norman G. | |
date accessioned | 2017-06-09T17:06:09Z | |
date available | 2017-06-09T17:06:09Z | |
date copyright | 2013/01/01 | |
date issued | 2012 | |
identifier issn | 0894-8755 | |
identifier other | ams-79413.pdf | |
identifier uri | http://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4222191 | |
description abstract | he cloud radiative effect (CRE) of each longwave (LW) absorption band of a GCM?s radiation code is uniquely valuable for GCM evaluation because 1) comparing band-by-band CRE avoids the compensating biases in the broadband CRE comparison and 2) the fractional contribution of each band to the LW broadband CRE (fCRE) is sensitive to cloud-top height but largely insensitive to cloud fraction, thereby presenting a diagnostic metric to separate the two macroscopic properties of clouds. Recent studies led by the first author have established methods to derive such band-by-band quantities from collocated Atmospheric Infrared Sounder (AIRS) and Clouds and the Earth?s Radiant Energy System (CERES) observations. A study is presented here that compares the observed band-by-band CRE over the tropical oceans with those simulated by three different atmospheric GCMs?the GFDL Atmospheric Model version 2 (GFDL AM2), NASA Goddard Earth Observing System version 5 (GEOS-5), and the fourth-generation AGCM of the Canadian Centre for Climate Modelling and Analysis (CCCma CanAM4)?forced by observed SST. The models agree with observation on the annual-mean LW broadband CRE over the tropical oceans within ±1 W m?2. However, the differences among these three GCMs in some bands can be as large as or even larger than ±1 W m?2. Observed seasonal cycles of fCRE in major bands are shown to be consistent with the seasonal cycle of cloud-top pressure for both the amplitude and the phase. However, while the three simulated seasonal cycles of fCRE agree with observations on the phase, the amplitudes are underestimated. Simulated interannual anomalies from GFDL AM2 and CCCma CanAM4 are in phase with observed anomalies. The spatial distribution of fCRE highlights the discrepancies between models and observation over the low-cloud regions and the compensating biases from different bands. | |
publisher | American Meteorological Society | |
title | Longwave Band-By-Band Cloud Radiative Effect and Its Application in GCM Evaluation | |
type | Journal Paper | |
journal volume | 26 | |
journal issue | 2 | |
journal title | Journal of Climate | |
identifier doi | 10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00112.1 | |
journal fristpage | 450 | |
journal lastpage | 467 | |
tree | Journal of Climate:;2012:;volume( 026 ):;issue: 002 | |
contenttype | Fulltext |