YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Climate
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Climate
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    GFDL’s ESM2 Global Coupled Climate–Carbon Earth System Models. Part I: Physical Formulation and Baseline Simulation Characteristics

    Source: Journal of Climate:;2012:;volume( 025 ):;issue: 019::page 6646
    Author:
    Dunne, John P.
    ,
    John, Jasmin G.
    ,
    Adcroft, Alistair J.
    ,
    Griffies, Stephen M.
    ,
    Hallberg, Robert W.
    ,
    Shevliakova, Elena
    ,
    Stouffer, Ronald J.
    ,
    Cooke, William
    ,
    Dunne, Krista A.
    ,
    Harrison, Matthew J.
    ,
    Krasting, John P.
    ,
    Malyshev, Sergey L.
    ,
    Milly, P. C. D.
    ,
    Phillipps, Peter J.
    ,
    Sentman, Lori T.
    ,
    Samuels, Bonita L.
    ,
    Spelman, Michael J.
    ,
    Winton, Michael
    ,
    Wittenberg, Andrew T.
    ,
    Zadeh, Niki
    DOI: 10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00560.1
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: he physical climate formulation and simulation characteristics of two new global coupled carbon?climate Earth System Models, ESM2M and ESM2G, are described. These models demonstrate similar climate fidelity as the Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory?s previous Climate Model version 2.1 (CM2.1) while incorporating explicit and consistent carbon dynamics. The two models differ exclusively in the physical ocean component; ESM2M uses Modular Ocean Model version 4p1 with vertical pressure layers while ESM2G uses Generalized Ocean Layer Dynamics with a bulk mixed layer and interior isopycnal layers. Differences in the ocean mean state include the thermocline depth being relatively deep in ESM2M and relatively shallow in ESM2G compared to observations. The crucial role of ocean dynamics on climate variability is highlighted in El Niño?Southern Oscillation being overly strong in ESM2M and overly weak in ESM2G relative to observations. Thus, while ESM2G might better represent climate changes relating to total heat content variability given its lack of long-term drift, gyre circulation, and ventilation in the North Pacific, tropical Atlantic, and Indian Oceans, and depth structure in the overturning and abyssal flows, ESM2M might better represent climate changes relating to surface circulation given its superior surface temperature, salinity, and height patterns, tropical Pacific circulation and variability, and Southern Ocean dynamics. The overall assessment is that neither model is fundamentally superior to the other, and that both models achieve sufficient fidelity to allow meaningful climate and earth system modeling applications. This affords the ability to assess the role of ocean configuration on earth system interactions in the context of two state-of-the-art coupled carbon?climate models.
    • Download: (7.761Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      GFDL’s ESM2 Global Coupled Climate–Carbon Earth System Models. Part I: Physical Formulation and Baseline Simulation Characteristics

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4221961
    Collections
    • Journal of Climate

    Show full item record

    contributor authorDunne, John P.
    contributor authorJohn, Jasmin G.
    contributor authorAdcroft, Alistair J.
    contributor authorGriffies, Stephen M.
    contributor authorHallberg, Robert W.
    contributor authorShevliakova, Elena
    contributor authorStouffer, Ronald J.
    contributor authorCooke, William
    contributor authorDunne, Krista A.
    contributor authorHarrison, Matthew J.
    contributor authorKrasting, John P.
    contributor authorMalyshev, Sergey L.
    contributor authorMilly, P. C. D.
    contributor authorPhillipps, Peter J.
    contributor authorSentman, Lori T.
    contributor authorSamuels, Bonita L.
    contributor authorSpelman, Michael J.
    contributor authorWinton, Michael
    contributor authorWittenberg, Andrew T.
    contributor authorZadeh, Niki
    date accessioned2017-06-09T17:05:21Z
    date available2017-06-09T17:05:21Z
    date copyright2012/10/01
    date issued2012
    identifier issn0894-8755
    identifier otherams-79206.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4221961
    description abstracthe physical climate formulation and simulation characteristics of two new global coupled carbon?climate Earth System Models, ESM2M and ESM2G, are described. These models demonstrate similar climate fidelity as the Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory?s previous Climate Model version 2.1 (CM2.1) while incorporating explicit and consistent carbon dynamics. The two models differ exclusively in the physical ocean component; ESM2M uses Modular Ocean Model version 4p1 with vertical pressure layers while ESM2G uses Generalized Ocean Layer Dynamics with a bulk mixed layer and interior isopycnal layers. Differences in the ocean mean state include the thermocline depth being relatively deep in ESM2M and relatively shallow in ESM2G compared to observations. The crucial role of ocean dynamics on climate variability is highlighted in El Niño?Southern Oscillation being overly strong in ESM2M and overly weak in ESM2G relative to observations. Thus, while ESM2G might better represent climate changes relating to total heat content variability given its lack of long-term drift, gyre circulation, and ventilation in the North Pacific, tropical Atlantic, and Indian Oceans, and depth structure in the overturning and abyssal flows, ESM2M might better represent climate changes relating to surface circulation given its superior surface temperature, salinity, and height patterns, tropical Pacific circulation and variability, and Southern Ocean dynamics. The overall assessment is that neither model is fundamentally superior to the other, and that both models achieve sufficient fidelity to allow meaningful climate and earth system modeling applications. This affords the ability to assess the role of ocean configuration on earth system interactions in the context of two state-of-the-art coupled carbon?climate models.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleGFDL’s ESM2 Global Coupled Climate–Carbon Earth System Models. Part I: Physical Formulation and Baseline Simulation Characteristics
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume25
    journal issue19
    journal titleJournal of Climate
    identifier doi10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00560.1
    journal fristpage6646
    journal lastpage6665
    treeJournal of Climate:;2012:;volume( 025 ):;issue: 019
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian