A Clustering Approach to Compare Cloud Model Simulations to Satellite Observations

Abstract

loud-resolving models (CRMs) offer an important pathway to interpret satellite observations of microphysical properties of storms. High-frequency microwave brightness temperatures (Tbs) respond to precipitating-sized ice particles and can therefore be compared with simulated Tbs at the same frequencies. By clustering the Tb vectors at these frequencies, the scene can be classified into distinct microphysical regimes (in other words, cloud types). A convective storm over the Amazon observed by the Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) is simulated using the Regional Atmospheric Modeling System (RAMS) in a semi-ideal setting, and four regimes are defined within the scene using cluster analysis: the ?clear sky/thin cirrus? cluster, the ?cloudy? cluster, the ?stratiform anvil? cluster, and the ?convective? cluster. Cluster-by-cluster comparisons between the observations and the simulations disclose biases in the model that are consistent with an overproduction of supercooled water and an excess of large hail particles. While other problems cannot be completely ruled out, the method does provide some guidance to assess microphysical fidelity within each cluster or cloud type. Guided by the apparent model/observational discrepancies in the convective cloud cluster, the hail size parameter was adjusted in order to produce a greater number of smaller hail particles consistent with the observations. While the work cannot define microphysical errors in an unambiguously fashion, the cluster analysis is seen as useful to isolate individual microphysical inconsistencies that can then be addressed within each cluster of cloud type.