YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Climate
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Climate
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Considerable Model–Data Mismatch in Temperature over China during the Mid-Holocene: Results of PMIP Simulations

    Source: Journal of Climate:;2012:;volume( 025 ):;issue: 012::page 4135
    Author:
    Jiang, Dabang
    ,
    Lang, Xianmei
    ,
    Tian, Zhiping
    ,
    Wang, Tao
    DOI: 10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00231.1
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: sing the experiments undertaken by 36 climate models participating in the Paleoclimate Modeling Intercomparison Project (PMIP), this study examines annual and seasonal surface temperatures over China during the mid-Holocene. Compared to the present or preindustrial climate, 35 out of the 36 PMIP models reproduced colder-than-baseline annual temperature, with an average cooling of 0.4 K, during that period. Seasonal temperature change followed closely the change in incoming solar radiation at the top of the atmosphere over China during the mid-Holocene. Temperature was reduced (elevated) in boreal winter and spring (summer) in all of the PMIP models, with an average of 1.4 K (1.0 K) at the national scale. Colder (warmer)-than-baseline temperatures were derived from 14 of the 16 atmosphere-only (18 of the 20 coupled) models during the mid-Holocene boreal autumn. Interactive ocean was found to lead to a warming effect on annual (0.3 K), boreal winter (0.5 K), and boreal autumn (0.7 K) temperatures, with reference to the atmosphere-only models. Interactive vegetation had little impact in terms of six pairs of coupled models with and without vegetation effects. The above results are in stark contrast to warmer-than-present annual and winter climate conditions as derived from multiproxy data for the mid-Holocene. Coupled models generally perform better than atmosphere-only models.
    • Download: (1.884Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Considerable Model–Data Mismatch in Temperature over China during the Mid-Holocene: Results of PMIP Simulations

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4221697
    Collections
    • Journal of Climate

    Show full item record

    contributor authorJiang, Dabang
    contributor authorLang, Xianmei
    contributor authorTian, Zhiping
    contributor authorWang, Tao
    date accessioned2017-06-09T17:04:24Z
    date available2017-06-09T17:04:24Z
    date copyright2012/06/01
    date issued2012
    identifier issn0894-8755
    identifier otherams-78970.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4221697
    description abstractsing the experiments undertaken by 36 climate models participating in the Paleoclimate Modeling Intercomparison Project (PMIP), this study examines annual and seasonal surface temperatures over China during the mid-Holocene. Compared to the present or preindustrial climate, 35 out of the 36 PMIP models reproduced colder-than-baseline annual temperature, with an average cooling of 0.4 K, during that period. Seasonal temperature change followed closely the change in incoming solar radiation at the top of the atmosphere over China during the mid-Holocene. Temperature was reduced (elevated) in boreal winter and spring (summer) in all of the PMIP models, with an average of 1.4 K (1.0 K) at the national scale. Colder (warmer)-than-baseline temperatures were derived from 14 of the 16 atmosphere-only (18 of the 20 coupled) models during the mid-Holocene boreal autumn. Interactive ocean was found to lead to a warming effect on annual (0.3 K), boreal winter (0.5 K), and boreal autumn (0.7 K) temperatures, with reference to the atmosphere-only models. Interactive vegetation had little impact in terms of six pairs of coupled models with and without vegetation effects. The above results are in stark contrast to warmer-than-present annual and winter climate conditions as derived from multiproxy data for the mid-Holocene. Coupled models generally perform better than atmosphere-only models.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleConsiderable Model–Data Mismatch in Temperature over China during the Mid-Holocene: Results of PMIP Simulations
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume25
    journal issue12
    journal titleJournal of Climate
    identifier doi10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00231.1
    journal fristpage4135
    journal lastpage4153
    treeJournal of Climate:;2012:;volume( 025 ):;issue: 012
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian