YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Climate
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Climate
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    A New Look at Stratospheric Sudden Warmings. Part II: Evaluation of Numerical Model Simulations

    Source: Journal of Climate:;2007:;volume( 020 ):;issue: 003::page 470
    Author:
    Charlton, Andrew J.
    ,
    Polvani, Lorenzo M.
    ,
    Perlwitz, Judith
    ,
    Sassi, Fabrizio
    ,
    Manzini, Elisa
    ,
    Shibata, Kiyotaka
    ,
    Pawson, Steven
    ,
    Nielsen, J. Eric
    ,
    Rind, David
    DOI: 10.1175/JCLI3994.1
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: The simulation of major midwinter stratospheric sudden warmings (SSWs) in six stratosphere-resolving general circulation models (GCMs) is examined. The GCMs are compared to a new climatology of SSWs, based on the dynamical characteristics of the events. First, the number, type, and temporal distribution of SSW events are evaluated. Most of the models show a lower frequency of SSW events than the climatology, which has a mean frequency of 6.0 SSWs per decade. Statistical tests show that three of the six models produce significantly fewer SSWs than the climatology, between 1.0 and 2.6 SSWs per decade. Second, four process-based diagnostics are calculated for all of the SSW events in each model. It is found that SSWs in the GCMs compare favorably with dynamical benchmarks for SSW established in the first part of the study. These results indicate that GCMs are capable of quite accurately simulating the dynamics required to produce SSWs, but with lower frequency than the climatology. Further dynamical diagnostics hint that, in at least one case, this is due to a lack of meridional heat flux in the lower stratosphere. Even though the SSWs simulated by most GCMs are dynamically realistic when compared to the NCEP?NCAR reanalysis, the reasons for the relative paucity of SSWs in GCMs remains an important and open question.
    • Download: (1.907Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      A New Look at Stratospheric Sudden Warmings. Part II: Evaluation of Numerical Model Simulations

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4221128
    Collections
    • Journal of Climate

    Show full item record

    contributor authorCharlton, Andrew J.
    contributor authorPolvani, Lorenzo M.
    contributor authorPerlwitz, Judith
    contributor authorSassi, Fabrizio
    contributor authorManzini, Elisa
    contributor authorShibata, Kiyotaka
    contributor authorPawson, Steven
    contributor authorNielsen, J. Eric
    contributor authorRind, David
    date accessioned2017-06-09T17:02:41Z
    date available2017-06-09T17:02:41Z
    date copyright2007/02/01
    date issued2007
    identifier issn0894-8755
    identifier otherams-78457.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4221128
    description abstractThe simulation of major midwinter stratospheric sudden warmings (SSWs) in six stratosphere-resolving general circulation models (GCMs) is examined. The GCMs are compared to a new climatology of SSWs, based on the dynamical characteristics of the events. First, the number, type, and temporal distribution of SSW events are evaluated. Most of the models show a lower frequency of SSW events than the climatology, which has a mean frequency of 6.0 SSWs per decade. Statistical tests show that three of the six models produce significantly fewer SSWs than the climatology, between 1.0 and 2.6 SSWs per decade. Second, four process-based diagnostics are calculated for all of the SSW events in each model. It is found that SSWs in the GCMs compare favorably with dynamical benchmarks for SSW established in the first part of the study. These results indicate that GCMs are capable of quite accurately simulating the dynamics required to produce SSWs, but with lower frequency than the climatology. Further dynamical diagnostics hint that, in at least one case, this is due to a lack of meridional heat flux in the lower stratosphere. Even though the SSWs simulated by most GCMs are dynamically realistic when compared to the NCEP?NCAR reanalysis, the reasons for the relative paucity of SSWs in GCMs remains an important and open question.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleA New Look at Stratospheric Sudden Warmings. Part II: Evaluation of Numerical Model Simulations
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume20
    journal issue3
    journal titleJournal of Climate
    identifier doi10.1175/JCLI3994.1
    journal fristpage470
    journal lastpage488
    treeJournal of Climate:;2007:;volume( 020 ):;issue: 003
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian